» Articles » PMID: 32364562

Security and Privacy Risks Associated With Adult Patient Portal Accounts in US Hospitals

Overview
Journal JAMA Intern Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2020 May 5
PMID 32364562
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: Patient portals can help caregivers better manage care for patients, but how caregivers access the patient portal could threaten patient security and privacy.

Objective: To identify the proportions of hospitals that provide proxy accounts to caregivers of adult patients, endorse password sharing with caregivers, and enable patients to restrict the types of information seen by their caregivers.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This national cross-sectional study included a telephone survey and was conducted from May 21, 2018, to December 20, 2018. The randomly selected sample comprised 1 independent hospital and 1 health system-affiliated general medical hospital from every US state and the District of Columbia. Specialty hospitals and those that did not have a patient portal in place were excluded. An interviewer posing as the daughter of an older adult patient called each hospital to ask about the hospital's patient portal practices. The interviewer used a structured questionnaire to obtain information on proxy account availability, password sharing, and patient control of their own information.

Main Outcomes And Measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of hospitals that provided proxy accounts to caregivers of adult patients. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of hospitals with personnel who endorsed password sharing and the proportion that allowed adult patients to limit the types of information available to caregivers.

Results: After exclusions, a total of 102 (51 health system-affiliated and 51 independent) hospitals were included in the study. Of these hospitals, 69 (68%) provided proxy accounts to caregivers of adult patients and 26 (25%) did not. In 7 of 102 hospitals (7%), the surveyed personnel did not know if proxy accounts were available. In the 94 hospitals asked about password sharing between the patient and caregiver, personnel in 42 hospitals (45%) endorsed the practice. Among hospitals that provided proxy accounts, only 13 of the 69 hospitals (19%) offered controls that enabled patients to restrict the types of information their proxies could see.

Conclusions And Relevance: This study found that almost half of surveyed hospital personnel recommended password sharing and that few hospitals enabled patients to limit the types of information seen by those with proxy access. These findings suggest that hospitals and electronic health record (HER) vendors need to improve the availability and setup process of proxy accounts in a way that allows caregivers to care for patients without violating their privacy.

Citing Articles

A Multisite Demonstration of Shared Access to Older Adults' Patient Portals.

Gleason K, DesRoches C, Wu M, Peereboom D, Dukhanin V, Farrell T JAMA Netw Open. 2025; 8(2):e2461803.

PMID: 39998827 PMC: 11862967. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.61803.


Shared Access to Adults' Patient Portals: A Secret Shopper Exercise.

Wachenheim D, Hurwitz I, Dukhanin V, Wolff J, DesRoches C Appl Clin Inform. 2024; 15(4):817-823.

PMID: 39038794 PMC: 11464159. DOI: 10.1055/a-2370-2220.


Patient Portals Fail to Collect Structured Information About Who Else is Involved in a Person's Care.

Salmi L, Peereboom D, Dorr D, Graham L, Wolff J, DesRoches C J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e49394.

PMID: 38935963 PMC: 11240061. DOI: 10.2196/49394.


A Nordic Perspective on Patient Online Record Access and the European Health Data Space.

Hagglund M, Kharko A, Barkas A, Blease C, Cajander A, DesRoches C J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e49084.

PMID: 38935430 PMC: 11240068. DOI: 10.2196/49084.


Care partners and consumer health information technology: A framework to guide systems-level initiatives in support of digital health equity.

Wolff J, Wec A, Peereboom D, Gleason K, Amjad H, Burgdorf J Learn Health Syst. 2024; 8(Suppl 1):e10408.

PMID: 38883870 PMC: 11176584. DOI: 10.1002/lrh2.10408.


References
1.
Irizarry T, DeVito Dabbs A, Curran C . Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review. J Med Internet Res. 2015; 17(6):e148. PMC: 4526960. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.4255. View

2.
Adler-Milstein J, Holmgren A, Kralovec P, Worzala C, Searcy T, Patel V . Electronic health record adoption in US hospitals: the emergence of a digital "advanced use" divide. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017; 24(6):1142-1148. PMC: 7651985. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocx080. View

3.
Semere W, Crossley S, Karter A, Lyles C, Brown 3rd W, Reed M . Secure Messaging with Physicians by Proxies for Patients with Diabetes: Findings from the ECLIPPSE Study. J Gen Intern Med. 2019; 34(11):2490-2496. PMC: 6848304. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-05259-1. View

4.
Latulipe C, Quandt S, Melius K, Bertoni A, Miller Jr D, Smith D . Insights Into Older Adult Patient Concerns Around the Caregiver Proxy Portal Use: Qualitative Interview Study. J Med Internet Res. 2018; 20(11):e10524. PMC: 6240158. DOI: 10.2196/10524. View

5.
Wolff J, Kim V, Mintz S, Stametz R, Griffin J . An environmental scan of shared access to patient portals. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017; 25(4):408-412. PMC: 6658842. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocx088. View