» Articles » PMID: 32362961

Which Information Helps Resolve Recall Failures for Familiar People's Names?

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2020 May 5
PMID 32362961
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Personal names are particularly susceptible to retrieval failures. In the present paper, studies describing people's spontaneous strategies for resolving failures in recalling personal names as well as laboratory studies of experimentally induced resolution of name recall failures are reviewed. The review indicates that people frequently use spontaneous strategies based on a search for structural, semantic, and contextual information about the target person. On the other hand, both cueing and priming experimental studies have shown that providing phonological information may help resolve a recall failure, whereas providing structural or semantic information is usually not helpful. A possible explanation of this discrepancy between the spontaneous use of semantic/contextual information and the experimentally demonstrated uselessness of this kind of information is provided. Finally, the role of syntactical similarity (belonging or not to the same part of speech) in the efficiency of phonological priming is discussed.

References
1.
Otsuka Y, Suzuki K, Fujii T, Miura R, Endo K, Kondo H . Proper name anomia after left temporal subcortical hemorrhage. Cortex. 2005; 41(1):39-47. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70176-x. View

2.
Hanley J, Cowell E . The effects of different types of retrieval cues on the recall of names of famous faces. Mem Cognit. 1988; 16(6):545-55. DOI: 10.3758/bf03197056. View

3.
Cross E, Burke D . Do alternative names block young and older adults' retrieval of proper names?. Brain Lang. 2004; 89(1):174-81. DOI: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00363-8. View

4.
Lucchelli F, De Renzi E . Proper name anomia. Cortex. 1992; 28(2):221-30. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80050-0. View

5.
White K, Abrams L . Does priming specific syllables during tip-of-the-tongue states facilitate word retrieval in older adults?. Psychol Aging. 2002; 17(2):226-35. View