» Articles » PMID: 32361919

Between-laboratory Reproducibility of Time-lapse Embryo Selection Using Qualitative and Quantitative Parameters: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2020 May 4
PMID 32361919
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the between-laboratory reproducibility of embryo selection/deselection effectiveness using qualitative and quantitative time-lapse parameters.

Methods: A systematic search was performed on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library (up to February 2020) without restriction on date, language, document type, and publication status. Measuring outcomes included implantation, blastulation, good-quality blastocyst formation, and euploid blastocyst.

Results: We detected 6 retrospective cohort studies externally validating the first clinical time-lapse model (Meseguer) emphasizing quantitative parameters, of which 3 (including one involving 2 independent centers) were included for the pooled analysis. Receiver operating characteristics analysis showed reduced predictive power of the model when either including or not including sister clinic validation. Fifteen cohort studies evaluating qualitative parameters were included for meta-analysis, and the mean Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was 5.3. Overall, meta-analysis showed significantly adverse association between the presence of ≥ 1 cleavage abnormalities and embryo implantation rates (11 studies, n = 7266; RR = 0.39[0.28, 0.55]; I = 57%). Further analysis showed adverse impacts of direct cleavage (7 studies, n = 7065; RR = 0.28 [0.15, 0.54] ; I = 46%), reverse cleavage (2 studies, n = 3622; RR = 0.16 [0.03, 0.75] ; I = 0%), chaotic cleavage (2 studies, n = 3643; RR = 0.11 [0.02, 0.69] ; I = 24%), and multinucleation (5 studies, n = 2576; RR = 0.59 [0.50, 0.69] ; I = 0%), but not the < 6 intercellular contact points at the 4-cell stage (1 study, n = 185; RR = 0.17 [0.02, 1.15] ).

Conclusions: Qualitative time-lapse parameters are reliably associated with embryo developmental potential among laboratories, whereas the reproducibility of time-lapse embryo selection model that emphasizes quantitative parameters may be compromised when externally applied.

Citing Articles

Non-invasive prediction of human embryonic ploidy using artificial intelligence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xin X, Wu S, Xu H, Ma Y, Bao N, Gao M EClinicalMedicine. 2024; 77:102897.

PMID: 39513188 PMC: 11541425. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102897.


Abnormal cleavage up to Day 3 does not compromise live birth and neonatal outcomes of embryos that have achieved full blastulation: a retrospective cohort study.

Lee T, Peirce K, Natalwala J, Chapple V, Mark P, Sanders K Hum Reprod. 2024; 39(5):955-962.

PMID: 38553025 PMC: 11063553. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deae062.


Early rescue oocyte activation at 5 h post-ICSI is a useful strategy for avoiding unexpected fertilization failure and low fertilization in ICSI cycles.

Xue L, Wang S, Wei P, Liu H, Mao X, Qin J Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 14:1301505.

PMID: 38239979 PMC: 10794723. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1301505.


A brief history of artificial intelligence embryo selection: from black-box to glass-box.

Lee T, Natalwala J, Chapple V, Liu Y Hum Reprod. 2023; 39(2):285-292.

PMID: 38061074 PMC: 11016335. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dead254.


Cleavage Patterns of 9600 Embryos: The Importance of Irregular Cleavage.

Shavit M, Gonen D, Atzmon Y, Aslih N, Bilgory A, Shibli Abu-Raya Y J Clin Med. 2023; 12(17).

PMID: 37685723 PMC: 10488943. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12175656.


References
1.
Armstrong S, Bhide P, Jordan V, Pacey A, Farquhar C . Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 5:CD011320. PMC: 6494546. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011320.pub3. View