» Articles » PMID: 32353969

Porous AlO-CNT Nanocomposite Membrane Produced by Spark Plasma Sintering with Tailored Microstructure and Properties for Water Treatment

Overview
Date 2020 May 2
PMID 32353969
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ceramic-based nanocomposite membranes are gaining great attention in various applications, such as water treatment; gas separation; oil and gas, amid their superior fouling resistance and remarkable chemical/thermal stability. Here, we report for the first time the use of spark plasma sintering (SPS) process to fabricate a porous alumina-carbon nanotubes (AlO-CNT) nanocomposite membrane for water treatment. The challenge is this work is to achieve a balance between the amount of porosity, desired for a high water flux, and the membrane strength level, required to resist the applied pressure during a water flow experiment. The effect of SPS process parameters (pressure, temperature, heating rate, and holding time) on the microstructure and properties of the developed membrane was investigated and correlated. A powder mixture composed of AlO and 5 wt % CNT was prepared with the addition of starch as a pore former and gum Arabic and sodium dodecyl sulfate as dispersants. The powder mixture was then sintered using SPS to produce a solid but porous nanocomposite membrane. The structure and microstructure of the developed membrane were characterized using X-ray diffraction and field emission scanning electron microscopy. The performance of the membrane was assessed in terms of porosity, permeability, and mechanical properties. Moreover, the adsorption capability of the membrane was performed by evaluating its removal efficacy for cadmium (II) from water. The microstructural analysis revealed that CNT were distributed within the alumina matrix and located mainly along the grain boundaries. The permeability and strength were highly influenced by the sintering pressure and temperature, respectively. The results indicated that the membrane sintered at a pressure of 10 MPa, temperature of 1100 °C, holding time of 5 min, and heating rate of 200 °C/min exhibited the best combination of permeability and strength. This developed membrane showed a significant removal efficiency of 97% for cadmium (II) in an aqueous solution.

Citing Articles

Performance comparison of nano-AlO-modified PVDF membranes fabricated two methods for enhanced dye removal.

Liu R, Yang J, Zhang R, Li H, Mu R RSC Adv. 2025; 15(6):4163-4172.

PMID: 39926242 PMC: 11803385. DOI: 10.1039/d4ra08615e.


Structure and Properties of Al-CNT-Based Composites Manufactured by Different Methods: A Brief Review.

Nurguzhin M, Janikeyev M, Omarbayev M, Yermakhanova A, Meiirbekov M, Zhumakhanov M Materials (Basel). 2025; 18(1.

PMID: 39795859 PMC: 11721926. DOI: 10.3390/ma18010214.


Optimization of isotropic MoS/PES membranes for efficient treatment of industrial oily wastewater.

Kayanja O, Hassan M, Hassanin A, Ohashi H, Khalil A RSC Adv. 2024; 14(17):12058-12070.

PMID: 38628476 PMC: 11019293. DOI: 10.1039/d4ra01052c.

References
1.
Momohjimoh I, Hussein M, Al-Aqeeli N . Recent Advances in the Processing and Properties of Alumina⁻CNT/SiC Nanocomposites. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2019; 9(1). PMC: 6358954. DOI: 10.3390/nano9010086. View

2.
Kayvani Fard A, McKay G, Buekenhoudt A, Al Sulaiti H, Motmans F, Khraisheh M . Inorganic Membranes: Preparation and Application for Water Treatment and Desalination. Materials (Basel). 2018; 11(1). PMC: 5793572. DOI: 10.3390/ma11010074. View

3.
Patel F, Khraisheh M, Atieh M, Laoui T . Novel Aluminum Oxide-Impregnated Carbon Nanotube Membrane for the Removal of Cadmium from Aqueous Solution. Materials (Basel). 2017; 10(10). PMC: 5666950. DOI: 10.3390/ma10101144. View

4.
Saheb N, Hayat U, Hassan S . Recent Advances and Future Prospects in Spark Plasma Sintered Alumina Hybrid Nanocomposites. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2019; 9(11). PMC: 6915451. DOI: 10.3390/nano9111607. View

5.
Fu F, Wang Q . Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: a review. J Environ Manage. 2010; 92(3):407-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.011. View