» Articles » PMID: 32351979

Comparison of Behavior and Genetic Structure in Populations of Family and Kenneled Beagles

Overview
Journal Front Vet Sci
Date 2020 May 1
PMID 32351979
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In dogs, the social and spatial restriction associated with living in a kennel environment could lead to chronic stress and the development of abnormal behaviors ("kennel-dog syndrome"). However, little is known about how kenneled dogs differ from their conspecifics living as pets in human families. In the current study, using a test battery exposing the dogs to novel stimuli, we compared the behavior of three groups of beagles: (1) kenneled dogs living in a restricted environment with limited human contact ( = 78), (2) family dogs living in human families as pets ( = 37), and (3) adopted dogs born in the kenneled population but raised in human families ( = 13). We found one factor comprising most of the test behaviors, labeled as Responsiveness. Family dogs and adopted dogs scored higher in Responsiveness than kenneled dogs. However, 23% of the kenneled dogs were comparable to family and adopted dogs based on a cluster analysis, indicating a similar (positive) reaction to novel stimuli, while 77% of the kenneled dogs were unresponsive (mostly immobile) in at least part of the test. To assess if the behavioral difference between the family and kenneled dogs could be due to genetic divergence of these two populations and/or to lower genetic diversity of the kenneled dogs, we analyzed their genetic structure using 11 microsatellite markers. We found no significant difference between the populations in their genetic diversity (i.e., heterozygosity, level of inbreeding), nor any evidence that the family and kenneled populations originated from different genetic pools. Thus, the behavior difference between the groups more likely reflects a G × E interaction, that is, the influence of specific genetic variants manifesting under specific environmental conditions (kennel life). Nevertheless, some kenneled individuals were (genetically) more resistant to social and environmental deprivation. Selecting for such animals could strongly improve the welfare of kenneled dog populations. Moreover, exploring the genetic background of their higher resilience could also help to better understand the genetics behind stress- and fear-related behaviors.

Citing Articles

Methods of behavioral testing in dogs: a scoping review and analysis of test stimuli.

Moser A, Welch M, Brown W, McGreevy P, Bennett P Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1455574.

PMID: 39479206 PMC: 11521878. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1455574.


Intranasal Oxytocin Improves Social Behavior in Laboratory Beagle Dogs () Using a Custom-Made Social Test Battery.

Turcsan B, Roman V, Levay G, Lendvai B, Kedves R, Petro E Front Vet Sci. 2022; 9:785805.

PMID: 35280140 PMC: 8907566. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.785805.


Genetic testing of dogs predicts problem behaviors in clinical and nonclinical samples.

Zapata I, Lilly M, Herron M, Serpell J, Alvarez C BMC Genomics. 2022; 23(1):102.

PMID: 35130840 PMC: 8819838. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-022-08351-9.


Man's best friend in life and death: scientific perspectives and challenges of dog brain banking.

Sandor S, Czeibert K, Salamon A, Kubinyi E Geroscience. 2021; 43(4):1653-1668.

PMID: 33970413 PMC: 8492856. DOI: 10.1007/s11357-021-00373-7.


Microsatellite DNA Analysis of Genetic Diversity and Parentage Testing in the Popular Dog Breeds in Poland.

Radko A, Podbielska A Genes (Basel). 2021; 12(4).

PMID: 33810589 PMC: 8066952. DOI: 10.3390/genes12040485.


References
1.
Gacsi M, Maros K, Sernkvist S, Farago T, Miklosi A . Human analogue safe haven effect of the owner: behavioural and heart rate response to stressful social stimuli in dogs. PLoS One. 2013; 8(3):e58475. PMC: 3587610. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058475. View

2.
Howell T, King T, Bennett P . Puppy parties and beyond: the role of early age socialization practices on adult dog behavior. Vet Med (Auckl). 2018; 6:143-153. PMC: 6067676. DOI: 10.2147/VMRR.S62081. View

3.
Pilot M, Jedrzejewski W, Branicki W, Sidorovich V, Jedrzejewska B, Stachura K . Ecological factors influence population genetic structure of European grey wolves. Mol Ecol. 2006; 15(14):4533-53. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03110.x. View

4.
Studzinski C, Christie L, Araujo J, Burnham W, Head E, Cotman C . Visuospatial function in the beagle dog: an early marker of cognitive decline in a model of human aging and dementia. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2006; 86(2):197-204. DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2006.02.005. View

5.
Acs V, Bokor A, Nagy I . Population Structure Analysis of the Border Collie Dog Breed in Hungary. Animals (Basel). 2019; 9(5). PMC: 6562970. DOI: 10.3390/ani9050250. View