» Articles » PMID: 32351952

A Machine Learning Approach to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Loading Using a Mobile Phone-Embedded IMU

Overview
Date 2020 May 1
PMID 32351952
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Hip osteoarthritis patients exhibit changes in kinematics and kinetics that affect joint loading. Monitoring this load can provide valuable information to clinicians. For example, a patient's joint loading measured across different activities can be used to determine the amount of exercise that the patient needs to complete each day. Unfortunately, current methods for measuring joint loading require a lab environment which most clinicians do not have access to. This study explores employing machine learning to construct a model that can estimate joint loading based on sensor data obtained solely from a mobile phone. In order to learn such a model, we collected a dataset from 10 patients with hip osteoarthritis who performed multiple repetitions of nine different exercises. During each repetition, we simultaneously recorded 3D motion capture data, ground reaction force data, and the inertial measurement unit data from a mobile phone attached to the patient's hip. The 3D motion and ground reaction force data were used to compute the ground truth joint loading using musculoskeletal modeling. Our goal is to estimate the ground truth loading value using only the data captured by the sensors of the mobile phone. We propose a machine learning pipeline for learning such a model based on the recordings of a phone's accelerometer and gyroscope. When evaluated for an unseen patient, the proposed pipeline achieves a mean absolute error of 29% for the left hip and 36% for the right hip. While our approach is a step in the direction of using a minimal number of sensors to estimate joint loading outside the lab, developing a tool that is accurate enough to be applicable in a clinical context still remains an open challenge. It may be necessary to use sensors at more than one location in order to obtain better estimates.

Citing Articles

Prediction of joint moments from kinematics using machine learning in children with congenital talipes equino varus and typically developing peers.

Kothurkar R, Gad M, Padate A, Rathod C, Bhaskar A, Lekurwale R J Orthop. 2024; 57:83-89.

PMID: 39006209 PMC: 11245943. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.06.016.


Sensor-Based Wearable Systems for Monitoring Human Motion and Posture: A Review.

Huang X, Xue Y, Ren S, Wang F Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(22).

PMID: 38005436 PMC: 10675437. DOI: 10.3390/s23229047.


Estimation of Lower Limb Joint Angles and Joint Moments during Different Locomotive Activities Using the Inertial Measurement Units and a Hybrid Deep Learning Model.

Wang F, Liang W, Muhammad Rehan Afzal H, Fan A, Li W, Dai X Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(22).

PMID: 38005427 PMC: 10674933. DOI: 10.3390/s23229039.


Wearable sensor and machine learning estimate tendon load and walking speed during immobilizing boot ambulation.

Kwon M, Hullfish T, Humbyrd C, Boakye L, Baxter J Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):18086.

PMID: 37872320 PMC: 10593749. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-45375-x.


A Neural Network Approach for Inertial Measurement Unit-Based Estimation of Three-Dimensional Spinal Curvature.

Mak T, Liang R, Chim T, Yip J Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(13).

PMID: 37447971 PMC: 10346651. DOI: 10.3390/s23136122.


References
1.
De Brabandere A, Op De Beeck T, Schutte K, Meert W, Vanwanseele B, Davis J . Data fusion of body-worn accelerometers and heart rate to predict VO2max during submaximal running. PLoS One. 2018; 13(6):e0199509. PMC: 6025864. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199509. View

2.
De Groote F, De Laet T, Jonkers I, De Schutter J . Kalman smoothing improves the estimation of joint kinematics and kinetics in marker-based human gait analysis. J Biomech. 2008; 41(16):3390-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.09.035. View

3.
Zargham A, Afschrift M, De Schutter J, Jonkers I, De Groote F . Inverse dynamic estimates of muscle recruitment and joint contact forces are more realistic when minimizing muscle activity rather than metabolic energy or contact forces. Gait Posture. 2019; 74:223-230. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.08.019. View

4.
Weyand P, Kelly M, Blackadar T, Darley J, Oliver S, Ohlenbusch N . Ambulatory estimates of maximal aerobic power from foot -ground contact times and heart rates in running humans. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2001; 91(1):451-8. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.2001.91.1.451. View

5.
Karatsidis A, Bellusci G, Schepers H, Zee M, Andersen M, Veltink P . Estimation of Ground Reaction Forces and Moments During Gait Using Only Inertial Motion Capture. Sensors (Basel). 2017; 17(1). PMC: 5298648. DOI: 10.3390/s17010075. View