» Articles » PMID: 32343516

Effect of Gaze Angle During the Vertical Video Head Impulse Test Across Two Devices in Healthy Adults and Subjects With Vestibular Loss

Overview
Journal Otol Neurotol
Date 2020 Apr 29
PMID 32343516
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of gaze angle on vertical vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain using two different video head impulse (vHIT) devices in healthy adults and subjects with bilateral vestibular loss (BVL).

Study Design: Prospective study.

Setting: Hospital research laboratory.

Subjects: Twenty-four healthy adults (mean [standard deviation {SD}] age = 32 [4.8]; 23-42; 8 men) and four subjects with previously diagnosed BVL (mean age [SD] = 32 [8.2]; 21-40; 3 men) participated.

Intervention: Vertical canal vHIT was administered with two different devices using three gaze angles (-45 degrees, 0 degree, +45 degrees). These devices have different gain calculation algorithms and different head and gaze angle protocols.

Main Outcome Measures: Vertical canal gain and presence or absence of reset saccades.

Results: A significant stepwise reduction in vHIT gain was noted as gaze moved away from the plane of the canals stimulated (from -45 degrees to 0 degree, to +45 degrees) for both healthy adults and subjects with BVL. vHIT gain was able to separate the two groups using gaze angles -45 degrees and 0 degree.

Conclusions: In spite of their differences in gain algorithm and recommended head position and gaze angle, each device was able to appropriately separate healthy adults from subjects with BVL with high sensitivity/specificity.

Citing Articles

Goggle Versus Remote-Camera Video Head Impulse Test Device Comparison.

Janky K, Patterson J, Vandervelde C Ear Hear. 2024; .

PMID: 38965656 PMC: 11700229. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001547.


Changes in vestibular-related responses to combined noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation and cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation.

Mitsutake T, Nakazono H, Shiozaki T, Fujita D, Sakamoto M Exp Brain Res. 2023; 242(1):99-108.

PMID: 37966504 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-023-06731-5.


Factors affecting variability in vestibulo-ocular reflex gain in the Video Head Impulse Test in individuals without vestibulopathy: A systematic review of literature.

Money-Nolan L, Flagge A Front Neurol. 2023; 14:1125951.

PMID: 36970532 PMC: 10034038. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1125951.


Stability of Vestibular Testing in Children With Hearing Loss.

Patterson J, Chen S, Janky K Am J Audiol. 2022; 31(4):1155-1166.

PMID: 36095287 PMC: 9907441. DOI: 10.1044/2022_AJA-21-00257.


Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Is Modulated by Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation.

Matsugi A, Shiozaki T, Tanaka H Front Neurol. 2022; 13:826739.

PMID: 35250830 PMC: 8893018. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.826739.

References
1.
McGarvie L, MacDougall H, Halmagyi G, Burgess A, Weber K, Curthoys I . The Video Head Impulse Test (vHIT) of Semicircular Canal Function - Age-Dependent Normative Values of VOR Gain in Healthy Subjects. Front Neurol. 2015; 6:154. PMC: 4495346. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2015.00154. View

2.
Janky K, Patterson J, Shepard N, Thomas M, Honaker J . Effects of Device on Video Head Impulse Test (vHIT) Gain. J Am Acad Audiol. 2017; 28(9):778-785. PMC: 5749241. DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.16138. View

3.
Hanley J, McNeil B . The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982; 143(1):29-36. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747. View

4.
Crawford J, Vilis T . Axes of eye rotation and Listing's law during rotations of the head. J Neurophysiol. 1991; 65(3):407-23. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1991.65.3.407. View

5.
Mantokoudis G, Saber Tehrani A, Kattah J, Eibenberger K, Guede C, Zee D . Quantifying the vestibulo-ocular reflex with video-oculography: nature and frequency of artifacts. Audiol Neurootol. 2014; 20(1):39-50. DOI: 10.1159/000362780. View