» Articles » PMID: 32342786

From Genetics to Genomics: Facing the Liability Implications in Clinical Care

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Health care is transitioning from genetics to genomics, in which single-gene testing for diagnosis is being replaced by multi-gene panels, genome-wide sequencing, and other multi-genic tests for disease diagnosis, prediction, prognosis, and treatment. This health care transition is spurring a new set of increased or novel liability risks for health care providers and test laboratories. This article describes this transition in both medical care and liability, and addresses 11 areas of potential increased or novel liability risk, offering recommendations to both health care and legal actors to address and manage those liability risks.

Citing Articles

Implementation of a Machine Learning Risk Prediction Model for Postpartum Depression in the Electronic Health Records.

Zhang Y, Joly R, Beecy A, Principe S, Satpathy S, Gore A AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2024; 2024:1057-1066.

PMID: 39444417 PMC: 11497630.


A Copernican revolution of multigenic analysis: A retrospective study on clinical exome sequencing in unclear genetic disorders.

Chetta M, Tarsitano M, Rivieccio M, Oro M, Cammarota A, De Marco M Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024; 23:2615-2622.

PMID: 39006921 PMC: 11245952. DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.06.011.


Exploring Genetic Testing for Rare Disorders of Obesity: Experience and Perspectives of Pediatric Weight Management Providers.

Roberts K, Chaves E, Ariza A, Thaker V, Cho C, Binns H Child Obes. 2024; 20(7):451-458.

PMID: 38227789 PMC: 11535453. DOI: 10.1089/chi.2023.0125.


When Germline Genetic Testing Results Are Unclear: Highlighting Variants of Uncertain Significance.

Kelly P, Mahon S, Friend P J Adv Pract Oncol. 2024; 14(7):631-638.

PMID: 38196669 PMC: 10715289. DOI: 10.6004/jadpro.2023.14.7.7.


Opt-in for secondary findings as part of diagnostic whole-exome sequencing: Real-life experience from an international diagnostic laboratory.

Brunfeldt M, Kaare M, Saarinen I, Koskenvuo J, Kaariainen H Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2023; 11(8):e2180.

PMID: 37025058 PMC: 10422066. DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.2180.


References
1.
Manolio T . Genomewide association studies and assessment of the risk of disease. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363(2):166-76. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra0905980. View

2.
Mallal S, Phillips E, Carosi G, Molina J, Workman C, Tomazic J . HLA-B*5701 screening for hypersensitivity to abacavir. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358(6):568-79. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706135. View

3.
Milstein A . Research malpractice and the issue of incidental findings. J Law Med Ethics. 2008; 36(2):356-60, 214. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00280.x. View

4.
Berg J, Amendola L, Eng C, Van Allen E, Gray S, Wagle N . Processes and preliminary outputs for identification of actionable genes as incidental findings in genomic sequence data in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium. Genet Med. 2013; 15(11):860-7. PMC: 3935342. DOI: 10.1038/gim.2013.133. View

5.
Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J . Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015; 17(5):405-24. PMC: 4544753. DOI: 10.1038/gim.2015.30. View