» Articles » PMID: 32341432

Analysing the Phenotype Development of Soybean Plants Using Low-cost 3D Reconstruction

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2020 Apr 29
PMID 32341432
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

With the development of digital agriculture, 3D reconstruction technology has been widely used to analyse crop phenotypes. To date, most research on 3D reconstruction of field crops has been limited to analysis of population characteristics. Therefore, in this study, we propose a method based on low-cost 3D reconstruction technology to analyse the phenotype development during the whole growth period. Based on the phenotypic parameters extracted from the 3D reconstruction model, we identified the "phenotypic fingerprint" of the relevant phenotypes throughout the whole growth period of soybean plants and completed analysis of the plant growth patterns using a logistic growth model. The phenotypic fingerprint showed that, before the R3 period, the growth of the five varieties was similar. After the R5 period, the differences among the five cultivars gradually increased. This result indicates that the phenotypic fingerprint can accurately reveal the patterns of phenotypic changes. The logistic growth model of soybean plants revealed the time points of maximum growth rate of the five soybean varieties, and this information can provide a basis for developing guidelines for water and fertiliser application to crops. These findings will provide effective guidance for breeding and field management of soybean and other crops.

Citing Articles

Plant height measurement using UAV-based aerial RGB and LiDAR images in soybean.

Pun Magar L, Sandifer J, Khatri D, Poudel S, Kc S, Gyawali B Front Plant Sci. 2025; 16:1488760.

PMID: 39949411 PMC: 11821976. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1488760.


Crops3D: a diverse 3D crop dataset for realistic perception and segmentation toward agricultural applications.

Zhu J, Zhai R, Ren H, Xie K, Du A, He X Sci Data. 2024; 11(1):1438.

PMID: 39730336 PMC: 11681092. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-024-04290-0.


PanicleNeRF: Low-Cost, High-Precision In-Field Phenotyping of Rice Panicles with Smartphone.

Yang X, Lu X, Xie P, Guo Z, Fang H, Fu H Plant Phenomics. 2024; 6:0279.

PMID: 39639877 PMC: 11617619. DOI: 10.34133/plantphenomics.0279.


Soybean genomics research community strategic plan: A vision for 2024-2028.

Stupar R, Locke A, Allen D, Stacey M, Ma J, Weiss J Plant Genome. 2024; 17(4):e20516.

PMID: 39572930 PMC: 11628913. DOI: 10.1002/tpg2.20516.


Harnessing Multi-Omics Strategies and Bioinformatics Innovations for Advancing Soybean Improvement: A Comprehensive Review.

Haidar S, Hooker J, Lackey S, Elian M, Puchacz N, Szczyglowski K Plants (Basel). 2024; 13(19).

PMID: 39409584 PMC: 11478702. DOI: 10.3390/plants13192714.


References
1.
Rose J, Paulus S, Kuhlmann H . Accuracy analysis of a multi-view stereo approach for phenotyping of tomato plants at the organ level. Sensors (Basel). 2015; 15(5):9651-65. PMC: 4481991. DOI: 10.3390/s150509651. View

2.
Paulus S, Dupuis J, Mahlein A, Kuhlmann H . Surface feature based classification of plant organs from 3D laserscanned point clouds for plant phenotyping. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013; 14:238. PMC: 3750309. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-238. View

3.
Shafiekhani A, Kadam S, Fritschi F, DeSouza G . Vinobot and Vinoculer: Two Robotic Platforms for High-Throughput Field Phenotyping. Sensors (Basel). 2017; 17(1). PMC: 5298785. DOI: 10.3390/s17010214. View

4.
Lei T, Udupa J . Performance evaluation of finite normal mixture model-based image segmentation techniques. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2008; 12(10):1153-69. DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2003.817251. View

5.
Naroditsky O, Zhou X, Gallier J, Roumeliotis S, Daniilidis K . Two efficient solutions for visual odometry using directional correspondence. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2011; 34(4):818-24. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2011.226. View