» Articles » PMID: 32322389

Perioperative Management of Gastrointestinal Surgery in a Resource-limited Hospital in Niger: Cross-sectional Study

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2020 Apr 24
PMID 32322389
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Perioperative management in digestive surgery is a challenge in sub-Saharan Africa. Objective: To describe the process and outcomes of perioperative management in gastrointestinal surgery.

Materials And Methods: This was a single center cross-sectional study over a 4-month period from June 1 to September 30, 2017, in a Nigerien hospital (West Africa). This study included caregivers and patients operated on gastrointestinal surgery.

Results: We collected data for 56 caregivers and 253 patients underwent gastrointestinal surgery. The average age of caregivers was 38.6 ± 8.7. The median length of professional practice was 9 years. Almost 52% of caregivers (n = 29) did not know the standards of perioperative care. The median age of patients was 24 years, and male gender constituted 70% of cases (n = 177) with a sex ratio of 2.32. Patients came from rural areas in 78.2% (n = 198). Emergency surgery accounted for 60% (n = 152). The most surgical procedure was digestive ostomies performed in 28.9% (n = 73), followed by hernia repair and appendectomy in 24.5% (n = 62) and 13.9% (n = 35) respectively. The postoperative course was complicated in 28.1% (n = 71) among which 13 deaths. In the group of caregivers, the poor practice of perioperative management was associated with poor professional qualification, insufficient equipment, insufficient motivation (p < 0.05). The ASA3&ASA4 score, undernutrition, emergency surgery, poor postoperative monitoring, and poor psychological preparation were associated with complicated postoperative outcomes (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The inadequacy of the technical platform and the lack of continuous training for healthcare staff represented the main dysfunctions of our hospital. The risk factors for complications found in this study need appropriate perioperative management to improve prognosis in gastrointestinal surgery.

References
1.
Mariette C, Alves A, Benoist S, Bretagnol F, Mabrut J, Slim K . [Perioperative care in digestive surgery]. J Chir (Paris). 2005; 142(1):14-28. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-7697(05)80831-2. View

2.
Gustafsson U, Scott M, Hubner M, Nygren J, Demartines N, Francis N . Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations: 2018. World J Surg. 2018; 43(3):659-695. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-018-4844-y. View

3.
Kluyts H, Le Manach Y, Munlemvo D, Madzimbamuto F, Basenero A, Coulibaly Y . The ASOS Surgical Risk Calculator: development and validation of a tool for identifying African surgical patients at risk of severe postoperative complications. Br J Anaesth. 2018; 121(6):1357-1363. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.08.005. View

4.
Clavien P, Sanabria J, Strasberg S . Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1992; 111(5):518-26. View

5.
Jammer I, Wickboldt N, Sander M, Smith A, Schultz M, Pelosi P . Standards for definitions and use of outcome measures for clinical effectiveness research in perioperative medicine: European Perioperative Clinical Outcome (EPCO) definitions: a statement from the ESA-ESICM joint taskforce on perioperative outcome.... Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014; 32(2):88-105. DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000118. View