» Articles » PMID: 32322235

Brain Morphometry Estimation: From Hours to Seconds Using Deep Learning

Overview
Journal Front Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2020 Apr 24
PMID 32322235
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Brain morphometry from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a promising neuroimaging biomarker for the non-invasive diagnosis and monitoring of neurodegenerative and neurological disorders. Current tools for brain morphometry often come with a high computational burden, making them hard to use in clinical routine, where time is often an issue. We propose a deep learning-based approach to predict the volumes of anatomically delineated subcortical regions of interest (ROI), and mean thicknesses and curvatures of cortical parcellations directly from T1-weighted MRI. Advantages are the timely availability of results while maintaining a clinically relevant accuracy. An anonymized dataset of 574 subjects (443 healthy controls and 131 patients with epilepsy) was used for the supervised training of a convolutional neural network (CNN). A ground truth was generated with FreeSurfer 6.0. The CNN predicts a total of 165 morphometric measures directly from raw MR images. Analysis of the results using intraclass correlation coefficients showed, in general, good correlation with FreeSurfer generated ground truth data, with some of the regions nearly reaching human inter-rater performance (ICC > 0.75). Cortical thicknesses predicted by the CNN showed cross-sectional annual age-related gray matter atrophy rates both globally (thickness change of -0.004 mm/year) and regionally in agreement with the literature. A statistical test to dichotomize patients with epilepsy from healthy controls revealed similar effect sizes for structures affecting all subtypes as reported in a large-scale epilepsy study. We demonstrate the general feasibility of using deep learning to estimate human brain morphometry directly from T1-weighted MRI within seconds. A comparison of the results to other publications shows accuracies of comparable magnitudes for the subcortical volumes and cortical thicknesses.

Citing Articles

A Deep Learning-Based Approach to Characterize Skull Physical Properties: A Phantom Study.

Aggrawal D, Saint-Martin L, Manwar R, Siegel A, Schonfeld D, Avanaki K J Biophotonics. 2024; 18(1):e202400131.

PMID: 39540545 PMC: 11700702. DOI: 10.1002/jbio.202400131.


Distinct and shared patterns of brain plasticity during electroconvulsive therapy and treatment as usual in depression: an observational multimodal MRI-study.

Bracht T, Walther S, Breit S, Mertse N, Federspiel A, Meyer A Transl Psychiatry. 2023; 13(1):6.

PMID: 36627288 PMC: 9832014. DOI: 10.1038/s41398-022-02304-2.


Agreement and Reliability between Clinically Available Software Programs in Measuring Volumes and Normative Percentiles of Segmented Brain Regions.

Song H, Lee S, Jo S, Chang S, Lim Y, Yoo Y Korean J Radiol. 2022; 23(10):959-975.

PMID: 36175000 PMC: 9523231. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2022.0067.


Direct cortical thickness estimation using deep learning-based anatomy segmentation and cortex parcellation.

Rebsamen M, Rummel C, Reyes M, Wiest R, McKinley R Hum Brain Mapp. 2020; 41(17):4804-4814.

PMID: 32786059 PMC: 7643371. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25159.

References
1.
May A, Gaser C . Magnetic resonance-based morphometry: a window into structural plasticity of the brain. Curr Opin Neurol. 2006; 19(4):407-11. DOI: 10.1097/01.wco.0000236622.91495.21. View

2.
Pardoe H, Pell G, Abbott D, Berg A, Jackson G . Multi-site voxel-based morphometry: methods and a feasibility demonstration with childhood absence epilepsy. Neuroimage. 2008; 42(2):611-6. PMC: 2603188. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.007. View

3.
Bearden C, Thompson P . Emerging Global Initiatives in Neurogenetics: The Enhancing Neuroimaging Genetics through Meta-analysis (ENIGMA) Consortium. Neuron. 2017; 94(2):232-236. PMC: 5918136. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.03.033. View

4.
Frisoni G, Jack Jr C, Bocchetta M, Bauer C, Frederiksen K, Liu Y . The EADC-ADNI Harmonized Protocol for manual hippocampal segmentation on magnetic resonance: evidence of validity. Alzheimers Dement. 2014; 11(2):111-25. PMC: 4422168. DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.05.1756. View

5.
Fisher E, Lee J, Nakamura K, Rudick R . Gray matter atrophy in multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal study. Ann Neurol. 2008; 64(3):255-65. DOI: 10.1002/ana.21436. View