» Articles » PMID: 32308919

Learning Inter-Sentence, Disorder-Centric, Biomedical Relationships from Medical Literature

Overview
Date 2020 Apr 21
PMID 32308919
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Relationships between disorders and their associated tests, treatments and symptoms underpin essential information needs of clinicians and can support biomedical knowledge bases, information retrieval and ultimately clinical decision support. These relationships exist in the biomedical literature, however they are not directly available and have to be extracted from the text. Existing, automated biomedical relationship extraction methods tend to be narrow in scope, e.g., protein-protein interactions, and pertain to intra-sentence relationships. The proposed approach targets intra and inter-sentence, disorder-centric relationship extraction. It employs an LSTM deep learning model that utilises a novel, sequential feature set, including medical concept embeddings. The LSTM model outperforms rule based and co-occurrence models by at least +78% in F1 score, suggesting that inter-sentence relationships are an important subset of all disorder-centric relations and that our approach shows promise for inter-sentence relationship extraction in this and possibly other domains.

Citing Articles

Leveraging Semantic Type Dependencies for Clinical Named Entity Recognition.

Le L, Zuccon G, Demartini G, Zhao G, Zhang X AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2023; 2022:662-671.

PMID: 37128396 PMC: 10148283.


Approaches for text mining of mHealth literature.

Ozaydin B, Zengul F, Oner N, Delen D Mhealth. 2022; 8:11.

PMID: 35449502 PMC: 9014235. DOI: 10.21037/mhealth-22-1.

References
1.
Rink B, Harabagiu S, Roberts K . Automatic extraction of relations between medical concepts in clinical texts. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011; 18(5):594-600. PMC: 3168312. DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000153. View

2.
Rindflesch T, Fiszman M . The interaction of domain knowledge and linguistic structure in natural language processing: interpreting hypernymic propositions in biomedical text. J Biomed Inform. 2004; 36(6):462-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2003.11.003. View

3.
Pyysalo S, Ginter F, Heimonen J, Bjorne J, Boberg J, Jarvinen J . BioInfer: a corpus for information extraction in the biomedical domain. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007; 8:50. PMC: 1808065. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-50. View

4.
Ely J, Osheroff J, Gorman P, Ebell M, Chambliss M, Pifer E . A taxonomy of generic clinical questions: classification study. BMJ. 2000; 321(7258):429-32. PMC: 27459. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.321.7258.429. View

5.
Gurulingappa H, Rajput A, Roberts A, Fluck J, Hofmann-Apitius M, Toldo L . Development of a benchmark corpus to support the automatic extraction of drug-related adverse effects from medical case reports. J Biomed Inform. 2012; 45(5):885-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2012.04.008. View