» Articles » PMID: 32306919

Patients Without Colonoscopic Follow-up After Abnormal Fecal Immunochemical Tests Are Often Unaware of the Abnormal Result and Report Several Barriers to Colonoscopy

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2020 Apr 21
PMID 32306919
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is the second most commonly used colorectal cancer (CRC) screening modality in the United States; yet, follow-up of abnormal FIT results with diagnostic colonoscopy is underutilized. Our objective was to determine patient-reported barriers to diagnostic colonoscopy following abnormal FIT in an academic healthcare setting.

Methods: We included patients age 50-75 with an abnormal FIT result between 1/1/2015 and 10/31/2017 and no documented follow-up diagnostic colonoscopy. We abstracted demographic data from the electronic health record (EHR). Study personnel conducted telephone surveys with patients to confirm colonoscopy completion and elicit data on notification of FIT results and barriers to colonoscopy. We also provided brief verbal education about diagnostic colonoscopy. We calculated frequencies of demographic data and survey responses and compared survey responses by interest in colonoscopy after education.

Results: We surveyed 67 patients. Fifty-one were aware of the abnormal FIT result, and a majority learned of the abnormal FIT result by direct communication with providers (19, 37.3%) or EHR messaging (11, 21.6%). Overall, fifty-three patients (79.1%) confirmed lack of colonoscopy, citing provider-related (19, 35.8%), patient-related (16, 30.2%), system-related (1, 1.9%), or multifactorial (17, 32.1%) reasons. Lack of knowledge of FIT result (14, 26.4%) was most common. After brief education, 20 (37.7%) patients requested colonoscopy.

Conclusion: Patients with an abnormal FIT reported various multi-level barriers to diagnostic colonoscopy after abnormal FIT, including knowledge of FIT results. When provided with brief education, participants expressed interest in diagnostic colonoscopy. Future efforts will evaluate interventions to improve colonoscopy follow-up.

Citing Articles

Abnormal Colorectal Cancer Test Follow-Up: A Quality Improvement Initiative at a Federally Qualified Health Center.

Shareef F, Bharti B, Garcia-Bigley F, Hernandez M, Nodora J, Liu J J Prim Care Community Health. 2024; 15():21501319241242571.

PMID: 38554066 PMC: 10981848. DOI: 10.1177/21501319241242571.


Screening for Colorectal Cancer: The Role of Clinical Laboratories.

Toth 3rd J, Trivedi M, Gupta S Clin Chem. 2024; 70(1):150-164.

PMID: 38175599 PMC: 10952004. DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvad198.


The recalibration and redevelopment of a model to calculate patients' probability of completing a colonoscopy following an abnormal fecal test.

Petrik A, Johnson E, Slaughter M, Leo M, Thompson J, Mummadi R J Med Screen. 2023; 31(1):28-34.

PMID: 37661831 PMC: 10909915. DOI: 10.1177/09691413231195568.


Reach and effectiveness of a centralized navigation program for patients with positive fecal immunochemical tests requiring follow-up colonoscopy.

OLeary M, Reuland D, Randolph C, Ferrari R, Brenner A, Wheeler S Prev Med Rep. 2023; 34:102211.

PMID: 37214164 PMC: 10196769. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102211.


Joint Asian Pacific Association of Gastroenterology (APAGE)-Asian Pacific Society of Digestive Endoscopy (APSDE) clinical practice guidelines on the use of non-invasive biomarkers for diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia.

Chan F, Wong M, Chan A, East J, Chiu H, Makharia G Gut. 2023; 72(7):1240-1254.

PMID: 37019620 PMC: 10314015. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-329429.


References
1.
Partin M, Gravely A, Burgess Jr J, Haggstrom D, Lillie S, Nelson D . Contribution of patient, physician, and environmental factors to demographic and health variation in colonoscopy follow-up for abnormal colorectal cancer screening test results. Cancer. 2017; 123(18):3502-3512. PMC: 5589505. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30765. View

2.
Oluloro A, Petrik A, Turner A, Kapka T, Rivelli J, Carney P . Timeliness of Colonoscopy After Abnormal Fecal Test Results in a Safety Net Practice. J Community Health. 2016; 41(4):864-70. PMC: 5400284. DOI: 10.1007/s10900-016-0165-y. View

3.
Baig N, Myers R, Turner B, Grana J, Rothermel T, Schlackman N . Physician-reported reasons for limited follow-up of patients with a positive fecal occult blood test screening result. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003; 98(9):2078-81. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07575.x. View

4.
White A, Joseph D, Rim S, Johnson C, Coleman M, Allemani C . Colon cancer survival in the United States by race and stage (2001-2009): Findings from the CONCORD-2 study. Cancer. 2017; 123 Suppl 24:5014-5036. PMC: 6152891. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31076. View

5.
Siegel R, Miller K, Jemal A . Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015; 65(1):5-29. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21254. View