» Articles » PMID: 32303243

Benchmarking the Transparency, Comprehensiveness and Specificity of Population Nutrition Commitments of Major Food Companies in Malaysia

Overview
Journal Global Health
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2020 Apr 19
PMID 32303243
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the commitments of food companies in Malaysia to improving population nutrition using the Business Impact Assessment on population nutrition and obesity (BIA-Obesity) tool and process, and proposing recommendations for industry action in line with government priorities and international norms.

Methods: BIA-Obesity good practice indicators for food industry commitments across a range of domains (n = 6) were adapted to the Malaysian context. Euromonitor market share data was used to identify major food and non-alcoholic beverage manufacturers (n = 22), quick service restaurants (5), and retailers (6) for inclusion in the assessment. Evidence of commitments, including from national and international entities, were compiled from publicly available information for each company published between 2014 and 2017. Companies were invited to review their gathered evidence and provide further information wherever available. A qualified Expert Panel (≥5 members for each domain) assessed commitments and disclosures collected against the BIA-Obesity scoring criteria. Weighted scores across domains were added and the derived percentage was used to rank companies. A Review Panel, comprising of the Expert Panel and additional government officials (n = 13), then formulated recommendations.

Results: Of the 33 selected companies, 6 participating companies agreed to provide more information. The median overall BIA-Obesity score was 11% across food industry sectors with only 8/33 companies achieving a score of > 25%. Participating (p < 0.001) and global (p = 0.036) companies achieved significantly higher scores than non-participating, and national or regional companies, respectively. Corporate strategy related to population nutrition (median score of 28%) was the highest scoring domain, while product formulation, accessibility, and promotion domains scored the lowest (median scores < 10%). Recommendations included the establishment of clear targets for product formulation, and strong commitments to reduce the exposure of children to promotion of unhealthy foods.

Conclusions: This is the first BIA-Obesity study to benchmark the population nutrition commitments of major food companies in Asia. Commitments of companies were generally vague and non-specific. In the absence of strong government regulation, an accountability framework, such as provided by the BIA-Obesity, is essential to monitor and benchmark company action to improve population nutrition.

Citing Articles

Food and beverage manufacturing and retailing company policies and commitments to improve the healthfulness of Canadian food environments.

Gaucher-Holm A, Chan J, Sacks G, Vaillancourt C, Vergeer L, Potvin Kent M BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2419.

PMID: 39237999 PMC: 11375943. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19864-1.


National Public Health Surveillance of Corporations in Key Unhealthy Commodity Industries - A Scoping Review and Framework Synthesis.

Bennett E, Topp S, Moodie A Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023; 12:6876.

PMID: 37579395 PMC: 10425693. DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.6876.


Benchmarking the nutrition-related commitments and practices of major French food companies.

van Dam I, Vandevijvere S BMC Public Health. 2022; 22(1):1435.

PMID: 35902838 PMC: 9330679. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13780-y.


Assessment of the Commitments and Performance of the European Food Industry to Improve Population Nutrition.

van Dam I, Guillon E, Robinson E, Allais O, Sacks G, Vandevijvere S Int J Public Health. 2022; 67:1604116.

PMID: 35719734 PMC: 9198223. DOI: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604116.


"Part of the Solution": Food Corporation Strategies for Regulatory Capture and Legitimacy.

Lacy-Nichols J, Williams O Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021; 10(12):845-856.

PMID: 34634883 PMC: 9309978. DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.111.


References
1.
Draper A, Adamson A, Clegg S, Malam S, Rigg M, Duncan S . Front-of-pack nutrition labelling: are multiple formats a problem for consumers?. Eur J Public Health. 2011; 23(3):517-21. PMC: 3662013. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckr144. View

2.
Sacks G, Rayner M, Stockley L, Scarborough P, Snowdon W, Swinburn B . Applications of nutrient profiling: potential role in diet-related chronic disease prevention and the feasibility of a core nutrient-profiling system. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2011; 65(3):298-306. DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2010.269. View

3.
Monteiro C, Moubarac J, Cannon G, Ng S, Popkin B . Ultra-processed products are becoming dominant in the global food system. Obes Rev. 2013; 14 Suppl 2:21-8. DOI: 10.1111/obr.12107. View

4.
Collin J, Hill S, Kandlik Eltanani M, Plotnikova E, Ralston R, Smith K . Can public health reconcile profits and pandemics? An analysis of attitudes to commercial sector engagement in health policy and research. PLoS One. 2017; 12(9):e0182612. PMC: 5590731. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182612. View

5.
Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, Thomson B, Graetz N, Margono C . Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014; 384(9945):766-81. PMC: 4624264. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60460-8. View