» Articles » PMID: 32301173

Three-dimensional Motion-corrected T Relaxometry with MPnRAGE

Overview
Journal Magn Reson Med
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Radiology
Date 2020 Apr 18
PMID 32301173
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To test the performance of the MPnRAGE motion-correction algorithm on quantitative relaxometry estimates.

Methods: Twelve children (9.4 ± 2.6 years, min = 6.5 years, max = 13.8 years) were imaged 3 times in a session without sedation. Stabilization padding was not used for the second and third scans. Quantitative T values were estimated in each voxel on images reconstructed with and without motion correction. Mean T values were assessed in various regions determined from automated segmentation algorithms. Statistical tests were performed on mean values and the coefficient of variation across the measurements. Accuracy of T estimates were determined by scanning the High Precision Devices (Boulder, CO) MRI system phantom with the same protocol.

Results: The T values obtained with MPnRAGE agreed within 4% of the reference values of the High Precision Devices phantom. The best fit line was T (MPnRAGE) = 1.02 T (reference)-0.9 ms, R  = 0.9999. For in vivo studies, motion correction reduced the coefficients of variation of mean T values in whole-brain tissue regions determined by FSL FAST by 74% ± 7%, and subcortical regions determined by FIRST and FreeSurfer by 32% ± 21% and 33% ± 26%, respectively. Across all participants, the mean coefficients of variation ranged from 0.8% to 2.0% for subcortical regions and 0.6% ± 0.5% for cortical regions when motion correction was applied.

Conclusion: The MPnRAGE technique demonstrated highly accurate values in phantom measurements. When combined with retrospective motion correction, MPnRAGE demonstrated highly reproducible T values, even in participants who moved during the acquisition.

Citing Articles

Microstructural neural correlates of maximal grip strength in autistic children: the role of the cortico-cerebellar network and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder features.

Surgent O, Guerrero-Gonzalez J, Dean 3rd D, Adluru N, Kirk G, Kecskemeti S Front Integr Neurosci. 2024; 18:1359099.

PMID: 38808069 PMC: 11130426. DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2024.1359099.


Role of autonomic, nociceptive, and limbic brainstem nuclei in core autism features.

Travers B, Surgent O, Guerrero-Gonzalez J, Dean 3rd D, Adluru N, Kecskemeti S Autism Res. 2024; 17(2):266-279.

PMID: 38278763 PMC: 10922575. DOI: 10.1002/aur.3096.


MP-RAVE: IR-Prepared T -Weighted Radial Stack-of-Stars 3D GRE imaging with retrospective motion correction.

Solomon E, Lotan E, Zan E, Sodickson D, Block K, Chandarana H Magn Reson Med. 2023; 90(1):202-210.

PMID: 36763847 PMC: 10323698. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29614.


Motion corrected silent ZTE neuroimaging.

Ljungberg E, Wood T, Solana A, Williams S, Barker G, Wiesinger F Magn Reson Med. 2022; 88(1):195-210.

PMID: 35381110 PMC: 9321117. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29201.


Improving Imaging of the Brainstem and Cerebellum in Autistic Children: Transformation-Based High-Resolution Diffusion MRI (TiDi-Fused) in the Human Brainstem.

Guerrero-Gonzalez J, Surgent O, Adluru N, Kirk G, Dean Iii D, Kecskemeti S Front Integr Neurosci. 2022; 16:804743.

PMID: 35310466 PMC: 8928227. DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2022.804743.


References
1.
Glover G, Pauly J . Projection reconstruction techniques for reduction of motion effects in MRI. Magn Reson Med. 1992; 28(2):275-89. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910280209. View

2.
Dean 3rd D, Planalp E, Wooten W, Adluru N, Kecskemeti S, Frye C . Mapping White Matter Microstructure in the One Month Human Brain. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):9759. PMC: 5575288. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-09915-6. View

3.
Zhang Y, Brady M, Smith S . Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001; 20(1):45-57. DOI: 10.1109/42.906424. View

4.
Mugler 3rd J, Brookeman J . Three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo imaging (3D MP RAGE). Magn Reson Med. 1990; 15(1):152-7. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910150117. View

5.
Nachmani A, Schurr R, Joskowicz L, Mezer A . The effect of motion correction interpolation on quantitative T1 mapping with MRI. Med Image Anal. 2018; 52:119-127. DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2018.11.012. View