» Articles » PMID: 32300586

Statistical Modeling of Lower Limb Kinetics During Deep Squat and Forward Lunge

Overview
Date 2020 Apr 18
PMID 32300586
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Modern statistics and higher computational power have opened novel possibilities to complex data analysis. While gait has been the utmost described motion in quantitative human motion analysis, descriptions of more challenging movements like the squat or lunge are currently lacking in the literature. The hip and knee joints are exposed to high forces and cause high morbidity and costs. Pre-surgical kinetic data acquisition on a patient-specific anatomy is also scarce in the literature. Studying the normal inter-patient kinetic variability may lead to other comparable studies to initiate more personalized therapies within the orthopedics.

Methods: Trials are performed by 50 healthy young males who were not overweight and approximately of the same age and activity level. Spatial marker trajectories and ground reaction force registrations are imported into the Anybody Modeling System based on subject-specific geometry and the state-of-the-art TLEM 2.0 dataset. Hip and knee joint reaction forces were obtained by a simulation with an inverse dynamics approach. With these forces, a statistical model that accounts for inter-subject variability was created. For this, we applied a principal component analysis in order to enable variance decomposition. This way, noise can be rejected and we still contemplate all waveform data, instead of using deduced spatiotemporal parameters like peak flexion or stride length as done in many gait analyses. In addition, this current paper is, to the authors' knowledge, the first to investigate the generalization of a kinetic model data toward the population.

Results: Average knee reaction forces range up to 7.16 times body weight for the forwarded leg during lunge. Conversely, during squat, the load is evenly distributed. For both motions, a reliable and compact statistical model was created. In the lunge model, the first 12 modes accounts for 95.26% of inter-individual population variance. For the maximal-depth squat, this was 95.69% for the first 14 modes. Model accuracies will increase when including more principal components.

Conclusion: Our model design was proved to be compact, accurate, and reliable. For models aimed at populations covering descriptive studies, the sample size must be at least 50.

Citing Articles

Personalized statistical modeling of soft tissue structures in the knee.

Van Oevelen A, Duquesne K, Peiffer M, Grammens J, Burssens A, Chevalier A Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023; 11:1055860.

PMID: 36970632 PMC: 10031007. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1055860.


A review of musculoskeletal modelling of human locomotion.

Sylvester A, Lautzenheiser S, Kramer P Interface Focus. 2021; 11(5):20200060.

PMID: 34938430 PMC: 8361578. DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2020.0060.


Statistical-Shape Prediction of Lower Limb Kinematics During Cycling, Squatting, Lunging, and Stepping-Are Bone Geometry Predictors Helpful?.

De Roeck J, Duquesne K, Van Houcke J, Audenaert E Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021; 9:696360.

PMID: 34322479 PMC: 8312572. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.696360.


A Semi-active Exoskeleton Based on EMGs Reduces Muscle Fatigue When Squatting.

Wang Z, Wu X, Zhang Y, Chen C, Liu S, Liu Y Front Neurorobot. 2021; 15:625479.

PMID: 33889081 PMC: 8056132. DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2021.625479.

References
1.
Bischoff J, Dai Y, Goodlett C, Davis B, Bandi M . Incorporating population-level variability in orthopedic biomechanical analysis: a review. J Biomech Eng. 2013; 136(2):021004. DOI: 10.1115/1.4026258. View

2.
Audenaert E, Pattyn C, Steenackers G, De Roeck J, Vandermeulen D, Claes P . Statistical Shape Modeling of Skeletal Anatomy for Sex Discrimination: Their Training Size, Sexual Dimorphism, and Asymmetry. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019; 7:302. PMC: 6837998. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00302. View

3.
Worsley P, Stokes M, Taylor M . Predicted knee kinematics and kinetics during functional activities using motion capture and musculoskeletal modelling in healthy older people. Gait Posture. 2010; 33(2):268-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.11.018. View

4.
Galloway F, Worsley P, Stokes M, Nair P, Taylor M . Development of a statistical model of knee kinetics for applications in pre-clinical testing. J Biomech. 2011; 45(1):191-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.09.009. View

5.
Henak C, Anderson A, Weiss J . Subject-specific analysis of joint contact mechanics: application to the study of osteoarthritis and surgical planning. J Biomech Eng. 2013; 135(2):021003. PMC: 3705883. DOI: 10.1115/1.4023386. View