» Articles » PMID: 32299847

Urban Versus Rural Residence and Outcomes in Older Patients with Breast Cancer

Overview
Date 2020 Apr 18
PMID 32299847
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A total of 20% of the U.S. population resides in rural areas, yet is served by 3% of oncologists, and 7% of nononcology specialists. Access to care issues can be compounded by lower socioeconomic status (SES) in rural areas, yet this issue is unexplored among older patients with breast cancer.

Methods: Using Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare, 109,608 patients diagnosed at ≥65 years with breast cancer between 2000 and 2011 were identified. Residence status was combined with Federal Poverty levels: urban (high, medium, and low poverty) and rural (high, medium, and low poverty). Five-year overall survival (OS) and healthcare utilization [HCU: visits to primary care provider (PCP), oncologist, nononcology specialist, and emergency department (ED)] were examined using urban/low poverty as reference. The residence, HCU, and mortality association was examined using mediation and moderation analyses.

Results: Median age was 76 years; 12.5% were rural, 15.6% high poverty. Five-year OS was 69.8% for rural and 70.9% for urban. Both urban- and rural/high-poverty patients had a 1.2-fold increased mortality hazard. Rural/high-poverty patients had a higher rate of PCP [year 1 (Y1): incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 1.23; year 2 (Y2)-year 5 (Y5): IRR = 1.19] and ED visits (Y1: IRR = 1.82; Y2-Y5: IRR = 1.43), but lower nononcology specialist visit rates (Y1: IRR = 0.74; Y2-Y5: IRR = 0.71). Paucity of nononcology specialist visits mediated 23%-57% of excess mortality risk. The interaction between residence/SES and paucity of nononcology specialist visits accounted for 49%-92% of excess mortality risk experienced by rural/high-poverty patients versus urban/low poverty.

Conclusions: Urban-rural residence mortality differences among older patients with breast cancer are highly predicated by poverty level.

Impact: Rural/high-poverty patients demonstrate less use of nononcology specialists compared with urban/low poverty, with disparities moderated by specialist use.

Citing Articles

Mammography Among Women Residing in Urban Versus Rural Utah: Breast Cancer Survival.

Tanner Q, Chang C, Curtin K, VanDerslice J, Gren L, Deshmukh V Cancer Med. 2024; 13(24):e70505.

PMID: 39679751 PMC: 11648033. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70505.


Comprehensive Analysis of Receptor Status, Histopathological Classifications (B1-B5), and Cumulative Histological Dimensions in Breast Cancer: Predictors of Malignancy and Diagnostic Implications.

Burciu O, Sas I, Merce A, Cerbu S, Moatar A, Eftenoiu A Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(20).

PMID: 39456566 PMC: 11506213. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16203471.


A scoping review of racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and geographic disparities in the outcomes of older adults with cancer.

Gilmore N, Grant S, Bethea T, Schiaffino M, Klepin H, Dale W J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024; 72(6):1867-1900.

PMID: 38593225 PMC: 11187671. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18881.


Estimating the Impact of Rurality in Disparities in Cancer Mortality.

Kenzik K, Davis E, Franks J, Bhatia S JCO Oncol Pract. 2024; 20(7):993-1002.

PMID: 38560814 PMC: 11440519. DOI: 10.1200/OP.23.00626.


The Impact of Health Inequities on Population-Based Breast Cancer Survival in a Colombian Population, 2008-2015.

Arias-Ortiz N, Rodriguez-Betancourt J, Toro-Toro J, Navarro-Lechuga E, Jurado-Fajardo D, Cardenas-Garzon K Cancer Control. 2024; 31:10732748241244928.

PMID: 38557156 PMC: 10986169. DOI: 10.1177/10732748241244928.