» Articles » PMID: 32299314

Clinical and Economic Impact of Pharmacist Interventions in an Ambulatory Hematology-oncology Department

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialties Oncology
Pharmacy
Date 2020 Apr 18
PMID 32299314
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate clinical and financial impact of pharmacist interventions in an ambulatory adult hematology-oncology department.

Methods: All cancer patients receiving a first injectable immuno- and/or chemotherapy regimen were included in this prospective study over a one-year period. The clinical impact of pharmacist interventions made by two clinical pharmacists was rated using the Clinical Economic and Organizational tool. Financial impact was calculated through cost savings and cost avoidance. Five hundred and fifty-eight patients were included. A total of 1970 pharmacist interventions were performed corresponding to a mean number of 3.5 pharmacist interventions/patient. The clinical impact of pharmacist interventions was classified as negative, null, minor, moderate, major and lethal in 0, 84 (4%), 1353 (68%), 385 (20%), 148 (8%) and 0 cases, respectively. The overall cost savings were €175,563. One hundred and nine (6%) of all pharmacist interventions concerned immuno- or chemotherapy regimen for cost savings of €148,032 (84% of the total amount of cost savings). The cost avoidance was €390,480. Cost avoidance results were robust to sensitivity analyses with cost of preventable adverse drug event as main driver of the model. When the cost of employing a pharmacist was subtracted from the average yearly cost savings plus cost avoidance per pharmacist, this yielded a net benefit of €223,021. The cost-benefit ratio of the clinical pharmacist was €3.7 for every €1 invested. To have two full-time clinical pharmacists in a 55-bed ambulatory adult hematology-oncology department is both clinically and financially beneficial.

Citing Articles

Determination of drug-related problems in the hematology service: a prospective interventional study.

Albayrak A, Ozbalci D BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):552.

PMID: 38698336 PMC: 11067252. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12291-w.


Multifaceted pharmacist-led interventions in secondary care settings between countries of various income levels: a scoping review protocol.

Tharmalinga Sharma J, McMillan S, Samaranayake N, Waas D, Coombes I, Wheeler A BMJ Open. 2024; 14(4):e083726.

PMID: 38594185 PMC: 11015257. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083726.


Patient Preferences for Pharmacy Services: A Systematic Review of Studies Based on Discrete Choice Experiments.

Riboulet M, Clairet A, Bennani M, Nerich V Patient. 2023; 17(1):13-24.

PMID: 38093090 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-023-00652-9.


Impact of a Tripartite Collaboration between Oncologist, Pharmacist and Diabetologist in the Management of Patients with Diabetes Starting Chemotherapy: The ONCODIAB Trial.

Paris J, Legris P, Devaux M, Bost S, Gueneau P, Rossi C Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(18).

PMID: 37760514 PMC: 10526306. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184544.


Impact of pharmacist alternative therapy interventions in a pediatric Medicaid population.

McNicol M, Wheaton K, Abdel-Rasoul M, Monangai K, Sebastian S J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023; 29(7):835-841.

PMID: 37404069 PMC: 10388013. DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.7.835.