The EORTC QLQ-C30 Summary Score As Prognostic Factor for Survival of Patients with Cancer in the "Real-World": Results from the Population-Based PROFILES Registry
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has been shown to be a prognostic factor for cancer survival in randomized clinical trials and observational "real-world" cohort studies; however, it remains unclear which HRQoL domains are the best prognosticators. The primary aims of this population-based, observational study were to (a) investigate the association between the novel European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core30 (QLQ-C30) summary score and all-cause mortality, adjusting for the more traditional sociodemographic and clinical prognostic factors; and (b) compare the prognostic value of the QLQ-C30 summary score with the global quality of life (QoL) and physical functioning scales of the QLQ-C30.
Materials And Methods: Between 2008 and 2015, patients with cancer (12 tumor types) were invited to participate in PROFILES disease-specific registry studies (response rate, 69%). In this secondary analysis of 6,895 patients, multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to investigate the association between the QLQ-C30 scores and all-cause mortality.
Results: In the overall Cox regression model including sociodemographic and clinical variables, the QLQ-C30 summary score was associated significantly with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 99% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-0.82). In stratified analyses, significant associations between the summary score and all-cause mortality were observed for colon, rectal, and prostate cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and multiple myeloma. The QLQ-C30 summary score had a stronger association with all-cause mortality than the global QoL scale (HR, 0.82; 99% CI, 0.77-0.86) or the physical functioning scale (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.77-0.85).
Conclusion: In a real-world setting, the QLQ-C30 summary score has a strong prognostic value for overall survival for a number of populations of patients with cancer above and beyond that provided by clinical and sociodemographic variables. The QLQ-C30 summary score appears to have more prognostic value than the global QoL, physical functioning, or any other scale within the QLQ-C30.
Implications For Practice: The finding that health-related quality of life provides distinct prognostic information beyond known sociodemographic and clinical measures, not only around cancer diagnosis (baseline) but also at follow-up, has implications for clinical practice. Implementation of cancer survivorship monitoring systems for ongoing surveillance may improve post-treatment rehabilitation that leads to better outcomes.
Wang Y, Diao H, Xu L, Peng Z Thorac Cancer. 2025; 16(5):e70041.
PMID: 40074689 PMC: 11903195. DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.70041.
Assessing the performance of QLQ-C30 in predicting all-cause mortality in community cancer patients.
Zhao J, Wang Y, Huang W, Xu R, Yang X, Wang P BMC Cancer. 2025; 25(1):421.
PMID: 40055624 PMC: 11889892. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-025-13624-z.
Alvarez-Salvago F, Figueroa-Mayordomo M, Molina-Garcia C, Pujol-Fuentes C, Atienzar-Aroca S, de Diego-Moreno M Life (Basel). 2025; 15(2).
PMID: 40003586 PMC: 11856788. DOI: 10.3390/life15020177.
Xia Y, Guan X, Shi Z, Luo Y, He P BMJ Open. 2025; 15(1):e093374.
PMID: 39880457 PMC: 11781134. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093374.
Vaca-Cartagena B, Ferrigno Guajardo A, Azim Jr H, Rotolo F, Olivas-Martinez A, Platas A Breast. 2025; 79:103866.
PMID: 39753060 PMC: 11755074. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103866.