» Articles » PMID: 32295968

Risk Factors for Adverse Events Associated with Bile Leak During EUS-guided Hepaticogastrostomy

Overview
Date 2020 Apr 17
PMID 32295968
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objective: EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (HGS) is performed for patients with advanced cancer because of poor prognosis and compromised status, and bile peritonitis may prove critical for such patients. This adverse event has the possibility of decreasing quality of life by prolonging the time until the start of oral intake, hospital stay, or chemotherapy. Predictors of bile peritonitis in EUS-HGS thus have considerable clinical impact. The aim of this study was to retrospectively determine risk factors of bile peritonitis as adverse events of EUS-HGS.

Patients And Methods: As risk factors of bile peritonitis, baseline characteristics of patients, characteristics of procedures such as number of punctures, types of fistula dilation, mean procedure time were analyzed. Furthermore, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to assess the influence of this distance and bile peritonitis and determine the optimum cutoff score for predicting the risk of bile peritonitis. Multivariate analysis using logistic regression was performed to examine factors of bile peritonitis.

Results: A total of 68 patients were enrolled in this study. A distance of 2.50 cm offered 90.3% sensitivity and 87.5% specificity in predicting bile peritonitis according to the ROC curve. Number of punctures (>1), procedure time (>20 min), distance to the hepatic parenchyma (<2.50 cm), and presence of acute cholangitis were significantly associated with bile peritonitis in univariate analysis. However, according to this multivariate analysis, distance to the hepatic parenchyma (<2.50 cm, odds ratio 96.98, 95% confidence interval 10.12-929.12, P < 0.001) were only significantly associated with bile peritonitis.

Conclusions: The short distance of hepatic parenchyma may be a risk factor of bile peritonitis.

Citing Articles

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy without tract dilation using a novel 0.035-inch guidewire.

Oishi R, Miwa H, Endo K, Tsuchiya H, Suzuki Y, Numata K Endoscopy. 2025; 57(S 01):E188-E189.

PMID: 39978395 PMC: 11842149. DOI: 10.1055/a-2535-1881.


Feasibility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy using a novel long balloon catheter.

Takano Y, Tamai N, Yamawaki M, Noda J, Azami T, Niiya F DEN Open. 2025; 5(1):e70082.

PMID: 39959851 PMC: 11827110. DOI: 10.1002/deo2.70082.


Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy in Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Comprehensive Review on Technical Tips and Clinical Outcomes.

Mazza S, Masciangelo G, Mauro A, Scalvini D, Torello Viera F, Bardone M Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(23).

PMID: 39682552 PMC: 11640186. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14232644.


Thin Delivery Stents Can Obviate the Need for Additional Fistula Dilatation of Large Diameter in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy.

Ogata T, Kurita Y, Sato T, Yagi S, Hasegawa S, Hosono K J Clin Med. 2024; 13(21).

PMID: 39518467 PMC: 11546826. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13216328.


Feasibility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy for Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction.

Ohno A, Fujimori N, Kaku T, Shimokawa Y, Miyagahara T, Suehiro Y Dig Dis Sci. 2024; 70(1):419-428.

PMID: 39342525 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-024-08652-x.


References
1.
Ogura T, Higuchi K . Technical tips for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2016; 22(15):3945-51. PMC: 4823244. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i15.3945. View

2.
Cho D, Lee S, Oh D, Song T, Park D, Seo D . Long-term outcomes of a newly developed hybrid metal stent for EUS-guided biliary drainage (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2016; 85(5):1067-1075. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.09.010. View

3.
Okuno N, Hara K, Mizuno N, Hijioka S, Imaoka H, Yamao K . Stent migration into the peritoneal cavity following endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy. Endoscopy. 2015; 47 Suppl 1 UCTN:E311. DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1392314. View

4.
Sharaiha R, Khan M, Kamal F, Tyberg A, Tombazzi C, Ali B . Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage in comparison with percutaneous biliary drainage when ERCP fails: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017; 85(5):904-914. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.023. View

5.
Dhir V, Isayama H, Itoi T, Almadi M, Siripun A, Teoh A . Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary and pancreatic duct interventions. Dig Endosc. 2017; 29(4):472-485. DOI: 10.1111/den.12818. View