» Articles » PMID: 32295965

Resectable Pancreatic Solid Lesions: Time to Move from Surgical Diagnosis?

Overview
Date 2020 Apr 17
PMID 32295965
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Benign or malignant conditions can present as pancreatic solid lesions (PSLs), and a thorough diagnostic workup is necessary to differentiate them. The need to acquire a tissue sample to reach a definitive diagnosis should be stratified by the findings at multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) with a pancreatic protocol. Tissue biopsy is currently indicated in patients fit for chemotherapy in whom a metastatic tumor or a locally advanced unresectable lesion are discovered. For these patients, EUS-guided tissue acquisition, with fine-needle aspiration (FNA) or biopsy represents the gold standard to provide a definitive cyto- and/or histopathologic diagnosis, with a high rate of accuracy. For resectable PSLs with a nonhypoenhancing MDCT pattern, which is not disease specific, a tissue diagnosis to distinguish benign from malignant etiologies appears mandatory. On the other hand, for hypo-enhancing PSLs, the debate of whether to obtain a preoperative definitive diagnosis still favors direct surgery. However, availability of novel EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy needles, which can ameliorate the negative predictive value of EUS-FNA and allow performance of DNA and RNA whole-genome extraction and RNA sequencing, coupled with the increasing evidence that preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be of value for these patients may change completely the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to resectable PSLs. These recent breakthroughs suggest the need for a new multidisciplinary consensus meeting to integrate them into the decision-making process assessing the need for preoperative tissue diagnosis in resectable PSLs.

Citing Articles

Methods to increase the diagnostic efficiency of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesions: An updated review.

Yang X, Liu Z, Zhou X, Yang F, Ma W, Sun X World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2024; 16(3):117-125.

PMID: 38577648 PMC: 10989249. DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i3.117.


The Rate of Avoidable Pancreatic Resections at a High-Volume Center: An Internal Quality Control and Critical Review.

Surci N, Rosch C, Kirchweger P, Havranek L, von Boetticher P, Fischer I J Clin Med. 2023; 12(4).

PMID: 36836160 PMC: 9967180. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041625.


Surgical Treatment of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Wei K, Hackert T Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(8).

PMID: 33923884 PMC: 8074119. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13081971.


Routine EUS-guided tissue acquisition in patients with resectable solid pancreatic masses - Pros and cons reassessment in 2020.

Lisotti A, Brighi N, Marocchi G, Fusaroli P Endosc Ultrasound. 2020; 9(6):417-418.

PMID: 32913148 PMC: 7811703. DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_48_20.

References
1.
Volmar K, Vollmer R, Jowell P, Nelson R, Xie H . Pancreatic FNA in 1000 cases: a comparison of imaging modalities. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005; 61(7):854-61. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(05)00364-0. View

2.
Bang J, Kirtane S, Krall K, Navaneethan U, Hasan M, Hawes R . In memoriam: Fine-needle aspiration, birth: Fine-needle biopsy: The changing trend in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition. Dig Endosc. 2018; 31(2):197-202. DOI: 10.1111/den.13280. View

3.
Fusaroli P, Napoleon B, Gincul R, Lefort C, Palazzo L, Palazzo M . The clinical impact of ultrasound contrast agents in EUS: a systematic review according to the levels of evidence. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016; 84(4):587-596.e10. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.06.006. View

4.
Hsu M, Pan K, Chu S, Hung C, Wu R, Tseng J . CT and MRI features of acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas with pathological correlations. Clin Radiol. 2010; 65(3):223-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2009.11.010. View

5.
Hebert-Magee S, Bae S, Varadarajulu S, Ramesh J, Frost A, Eloubeidi M . The presence of a cytopathologist increases the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis. Cytopathology. 2013; 24(3):159-71. PMC: 4159090. DOI: 10.1111/cyt.12071. View