» Articles » PMID: 32294624

Blastocyst-stage Embryos Provide Better Frozen-thawed Embryo Transfer Outcomes for Young Patients with Previous Fresh Embryo Transfer Failure

Overview
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2020 Apr 16
PMID 32294624
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Older patients or patients with a reduced ovarian response have a low number of embryos, which limits the opportunity for embryo selection. However, for young patients undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer (ET), it remains unclear whether embryo stage affects pregnancy outcomes. In the present study, a total of 2952 patients undergoing their first frozen-thawed ET were divided into two groups: patients who had experienced one failed fresh ET (Group A) and patients who had not received fresh ET because of the high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) (Group B). Our results show that Group B patients had a significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR) than Group A patients. However, Group A patients who underwent blastocyst-stage frozen-thawed ET had a significantly higher CPR and LBR and a lower ectopic pregnancy rate (ePR) than did those who underwent cleavage-stage frozen-thawed ET. In Group B, CPR, ePR, LBR and spontaneous abortion rate (sAR) were similar with blastocyst-stage and cleavage-stage frozen-thawed ET. These results suggest that blastocyst-stage frozen-thawed ET is more appropriate for young patients who had previously undergone one failed fresh ET cycle.

Citing Articles

Does The Culture of Post-Thawed Cleavage-Stage Embryos to Blastocysts Improve Infertility Treatment Outcomes of Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles? A Randomised Clinical Trial.

Madani T, Jahangiri N, Yahyaei A, Vesali S, Zarei M, Eftekhari-Yazdi P Int J Fertil Steril. 2024; 18(2):146-152.

PMID: 38368518 PMC: 10875310. DOI: 10.22074/ijfs.2023.560780.1357.


Parent Joint AB Blood Group Is Associated With Clinical Outcomes of Fertilization and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Treatment in Chinese Women.

Bao X, Zhao F, Shi H, Bu Z, Liang Y, Sun Y Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:813781.

PMID: 35602516 PMC: 9115895. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.813781.


Case Report: Twin Pregnancy Gives Birth to a Girl with Partial Trisomy 21 Mosaicism after Fertilization and Embryo Transfer.

Guo Z, Kang B, Wu D, Xiao H, Hao L, Hao B Front Genet. 2022; 12:740415.

PMID: 35185999 PMC: 8850307. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.740415.


Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome Is Associated with a High Secondary Sex Ratio in Fresh IVF Cycles with Cleavage-Stage Embryo Transfer: Results for a Cohort Study.

Jia Q, Fang L, Wang Z, Wu Z, Yan Y, Liu B Reprod Sci. 2021; 28(12):3341-3351.

PMID: 34081318 DOI: 10.1007/s43032-021-00637-9.

References
1.
Enciso M, Carrascosa J, Sarasa J, Martinez-Ortiz P, Munne S, Horcajadas J . Development of a new comprehensive and reliable endometrial receptivity map (ER Map/ER Grade) based on RT-qPCR gene expression analysis. Hum Reprod. 2018; 33(2):220-228. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dex370. View

2.
Du T, Chen H, Fu R, Chen Q, Wang Y, Mol B . Comparison of ectopic pregnancy risk among transfers of embryos vitrified on day 3, day 5, and day 6. Fertil Steril. 2017; 108(1):108-116.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.05.027. View

3.
Groenewoud E, Cantineau A, Kollen B, Macklon N, Cohlen B . What is the optimal means of preparing the endometrium in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2013; 19(5):458-70. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmt030. View

4.
Shapiro B, Daneshmand S, Garner F, Aguirre M, Hudson C, Thomas S . Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders. Fertil Steril. 2011; 96(2):344-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.050. View

5.
Martins W, Nastri C, Rienzi L, van der Poel S, Gracia C, Racowsky C . Blastocyst vs cleavage-stage embryo transfer: systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 49(5):583-591. DOI: 10.1002/uog.17327. View