» Articles » PMID: 32290231

PBA Preferentially Impairs Cell Survival of Glioblastomas Carrying Mutp53 by Reducing Its Expression Level, Stabilizing Wtp53, Downregulating the Mevalonate Kinase and Dysregulating UPR

Overview
Journal Biomolecules
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 Apr 16
PMID 32290231
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Phenylbutyrate (PBA) is a derivative of Butyric Acid (BA), which has the characteristics of being a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor and acting as a chemical chaperone. It has the potential to counteract a variety of different diseases, from neurodegeneration to cancer. In this study, we investigated the cytotoxic effect of PBA against glioblastoma cells carrying wt or mutant (mut) p53 and found that it exerted a higher cytotoxic effect against the latter in comparison with the former. This could be due to the downregulation of mutp53, to whose pro-survival effects cancer cells become addicted. In correlation with mutp53 reduction and wtp53 activation, PBA downregulated the expression level of mevalonate kinase (MVK), a key kinase of the mevalonate pathway strongly involved in cancer cell survival. Here we differentiated the chaperoning function of PBA from the others anti-cancer potentiality by comparing its effects to those exerted by NaB, another HDACi that derives from BA but, lacking the phenyl group, cannot act as a chemical chaperone. Interestingly, we observed that PBA induced a stronger cytotoxic effect compared to NaB against U373 cells as it skewed the Unfolded Protein Response (UPR) towards cell death induction, upregulating CHOP and downregulating BIP, and was more efficient in downregulating MVK. The findings of this study suggest that PBA represents a promising molecule against glioblastomas, especially those carrying mutp53, and its use, approved by FDA for urea cycle disorders, should be extended to the glioblastoma anticancer therapy.

Citing Articles

The unfolded protein response machinery in glioblastoma genesis, chemoresistance and as a druggable target.

Simbilyabo L, Yang L, Wen J, Liu Z CNS Neurosci Ther. 2024; 30(7):e14839.

PMID: 39021040 PMC: 11255034. DOI: 10.1111/cns.14839.


Influence of the Fatty Acid Metabolism on the Mode of Action of a Cisplatin(IV) Complex with Phenylbutyrate as Axial Ligands.

Mendrina T, Poetsch I, Schueffl H, Baier D, Pirker C, Ries A Pharmaceutics. 2023; 15(2.

PMID: 36839999 PMC: 9967619. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15020677.


Recent Advances in p53.

DOrazi G Biomolecules. 2021; 11(2).

PMID: 33546313 PMC: 7913554. DOI: 10.3390/biom11020211.


STAT3 and mutp53 Engage a Positive Feedback Loop Involving HSP90 and the Mevalonate Pathway.

Romeo M, Gilardini Montani M, Benedetti R, Santarelli R, DOrazi G, Cirone M Front Oncol. 2020; 10:1102.

PMID: 32754441 PMC: 7367154. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01102.

References
1.
Moon S, Huang C, Houlihan S, Regunath K, Freed-Pastor W, Morris 4th J . p53 Represses the Mevalonate Pathway to Mediate Tumor Suppression. Cell. 2018; 176(3):564-580.e19. PMC: 6483089. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.011. View

2.
Gilardini Montani M, Cecere N, Granato M, Romeo M, Falcinelli L, Ciciarelli U . Mutant p53, Stabilized by Its Interplay with HSP90, Activates a Positive Feed-Back Loop Between NRF2 and p62 that Induces Chemo-Resistance to Apigenin in Pancreatic Cancer Cells. Cancers (Basel). 2019; 11(5). PMC: 6562395. DOI: 10.3390/cancers11050703. View

3.
Wang Z, Wu Y, Wang H, Zhang Y, Mei L, Fang X . Interplay of mevalonate and Hippo pathways regulates RHAMM transcription via YAP to modulate breast cancer cell motility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 111(1):E89-98. PMC: 3890879. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1319190110. View

4.
Samid D, Ram Z, Hudgins W, Shack S, Liu L, Walbridge S . Selective activity of phenylacetate against malignant gliomas: resemblance to fetal brain damage in phenylketonuria. Cancer Res. 1994; 54(4):891-5. View

5.
Pirmoradi L, Seyfizadeh N, Ghavami S, Zeki A, Shojaei S . Targeting cholesterol metabolism in glioblastoma: a new therapeutic approach in cancer therapy. J Investig Med. 2019; 67(4):715-719. DOI: 10.1136/jim-2018-000962. View