» Articles » PMID: 32289795

Return of Research-Related Genetic Test Results and Genetic Discrimination Concerns: Facilitators and Barriers of Genetic Research Participation in Diverse Groups

Overview
Specialties Genetics
Public Health
Date 2020 Apr 15
PMID 32289795
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Most genetics studies lack the diversity necessary to ensure that all groups benefit from genetic research.

Objectives: To explore facilitators and barriers to genetic research participation.

Methods: We conducted a survey on genetics in research and healthcare from November 15, 2017 to February 28, 2018 among adult Kaiser Permanente (KP) members who had been invited to participate in the KP biobank (KP Research Bank). We used logistic regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing the willingness to participate in genetic research under different return of results scenarios and genetic discrimination concerns between groups, according to their demographic characteristics.

Results: A total of 57,331 KP members were invited to participate, and 10,369 completed the survey (18% response rate). Respondents were 65% female, 44% non-Hispanic White (NH White), 22% Asian/Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander (Asian/PI), 19% non-Hispanic Black (NH Black), and 16% Hispanic. Respondents willing to participate in genetic research ranged from 22% with no results returned to 87% if health-related genetic results were returned. We also found variation by race/ethnicity; when no results were to be returned, Asian/PIs, Hispanics, and NH Blacks were less likely to want to participate than NH Whites (p < 0.05). However, when results were returned, disparities in the willingness to participate disappeared for NH Blacks and Hispanics. Genetic discrimination concerns were more prevalent in Asian/PIs, Hispanics, and NH Blacks than in NH Whites (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Policies that prohibit the return of results and do not address genetic discrimination concerns may contribute to a greater underrepresentation of diverse groups in genetic research.

Citing Articles

Patient Perspectives on Personalized Risk Communication Using Polygenic Risk Scores to Inform Colorectal Cancer Screening Decisions.

Goldberg S, Ko L, Hsu L, Yin H, Kooperberg C, Peters U AJPM Focus. 2025; 4(1):100308.

PMID: 39866161 PMC: 11761838. DOI: 10.1016/j.focus.2024.100308.


Barriers, motivators and strategies to increase participation in genetic research among Asian and Black families of autistic individuals.

Tafolla M, Amador R, Oyeyemi M, Algaze Z, Pandey J, Goin-Kochel R J Community Genet. 2024; 15(5):559-572.

PMID: 39136857 PMC: 11549258. DOI: 10.1007/s12687-024-00724-9.


A proposal for an inclusive working definition of genetic discrimination to promote a more coherent debate.

Kaiser B, Uberoi D, Raven-Adams M, Cheung K, Bruns A, Chandrasekharan S Nat Genet. 2024; 56(7):1339-1345.

PMID: 38914718 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-024-01786-8.


Views of adults living with sickle cell disease on the theoretical return of secondary genomic findings.

Floyd K, Wossenseged F, Buscetta A, Fasaye G, Bonham V Genet Med. 2023; 26(1):100993.

PMID: 37811899 PMC: 10859184. DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2023.100993.


Returning Individual Research Results from Digital Phenotyping in Psychiatry.

Shen F, Baum M, Martinez-Martin N, Miner A, Abraham M, Brownstein C Am J Bioeth. 2023; 24(2):69-90.

PMID: 37155651 PMC: 10630534. DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2180109.