» Articles » PMID: 32287147

Acute Intraocular Pressure Responses to Reading: The Influence of Body Position

Overview
Journal J Glaucoma
Date 2020 Apr 15
PMID 32287147
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: IOP is sensitive to near work and body position, however, the influence of the body position adopted while performing near tasks remains unknown. This study aimed to assess the IOP changes induced by reading on a smartphone in sitting and supine position, and to explore whether these IOP changes differ between men and women.

Methods: Twenty-four healthy young adults (12 men and 12 women) read a text on a smartphone placed at 30 cm for 25 minutes while lying down and sitting in 2 different days. A rebound tonometer, which allows assessing IOP in the supine position, was used to measure IOP before reading, during reading (5, 15, and 25 min), and after 5 minutes of recovery. Complementarily, the authors checked the level of sleepiness/alertness before reading, and the perceived levels of fatigue and discomfort after reading.

Results: The data showed that reading induces an IOP rise [P<0.001, partial eta squared (ηp)=0.44]. These effects were more accentuated when reading in the supine position in comparison with the sitting position (P=0.019, ηp=0.23) with an increment of 2.4 mm Hg (14%) and 1.3 mm Hg (8%) after 25 minutes of reading, respectively. The IOP rises associated with reading did not differ between men and women (P=0.127). Participants reported greater levels of discomfort in the neck and back when reading in the sitting position (P=0.012, ηp=0.25).

Conclusions: The IOP rises associated with reading are greater when it is performed in the supine position in comparison with the sitting position. The present findings indicate that reading in the supine position should be discouraged in individuals who should avoid IOP increments or fluctuations.

Citing Articles

The impact of different postures on acute intraocular pressure and accommodation responses during reading.

Liang X, Wei S, Li S, Zhao S, Zhang Y, Wang N BMC Ophthalmol. 2024; 24(1):405.

PMID: 39285340 PMC: 11403858. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-024-03675-4.


Exploring the relationship between accommodation and intraocular pressure: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Ambrosini G, Poletti S, Roberti G, Carnevale C, Manni G, Coco G Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024; 263(1):3-22.

PMID: 39039270 PMC: 11807068. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-024-06565-z.


Differences Between Angle Configurations in Different Body Positions by Ultrasound Biomicroscopy in Patients with Cortical Age-Related Cataract.

Wang F, Yu Z, Xue S, Wang Y, Li L, Wang D Clin Interv Aging. 2023; 18:799-808.

PMID: 37215396 PMC: 10199412. DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S408798.


Influence of the body positions adopted for resistance training on intraocular pressure: a comparison between the supine and seated positions.

Lara P, Redondo B, Jerez-Mayorga D, Martinez-Garcia D, Garcia-Ramos A, Vera J Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023; 261(7):1971-1978.

PMID: 36795163 PMC: 10272256. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-023-06009-0.


The Influence of Near Vision Tasks on Intraocular Pressure in Normal Subjects and Glaucoma Patients.

Pakravan M, Samaeili A, Esfandiari H, Hassanpour K, Hooshmandi S, Yazdani S J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2023; 17(4):497-504.

PMID: 36620721 PMC: 9806325. DOI: 10.18502/jovr.v17i4.12350.