» Articles » PMID: 32285013

The Need for a System View to Regulate Artificial Intelligence/machine Learning-based Software As Medical Device

Overview
Journal NPJ Digit Med
Date 2020 Apr 15
PMID 32285013
Citations 62
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) and Machine learning (ML) systems in medicine are poised to significantly improve health care, for example, by offering earlier diagnoses of diseases or recommending optimally individualized treatment plans. However, the emergence of AI/ML in medicine also creates challenges, which regulators must pay attention to. Which medical AI/ML-based products should be reviewed by regulators? What evidence should be required to permit marketing for AI/ML-based software as a medical device (SaMD)? How can we ensure the safety and effectiveness of AI/ML-based SaMD that may change over time as they are applied to new data? The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), for example, has recently proposed a discussion paper to address some of these issues. But it misses an important point: we argue that regulators like the FDA need to widen their scope from evaluating medical AI/ML-based products to assessing systems. This shift in perspective-from a product view to a system view-is central to maximizing the safety and efficacy of AI/ML in health care, but it also poses significant challenges for agencies like the FDA who are used to regulating products, not systems. We offer several suggestions for regulators to make this challenging but important transition.

Citing Articles

CORE-MD clinical risk score for regulatory evaluation of artificial intelligence-based medical device software.

Rademakers F, Biasin E, Bruining N, Caiani E, Davies R, Gilbert S NPJ Digit Med. 2025; 8(1):90.

PMID: 39915308 PMC: 11802784. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-025-01459-8.


Race to the Moon or the Bottom? Applications, Performance, and Ethical Considerations of Artificial Intelligence in Prosthodontics and Implant Dentistry.

Alfaraj A, Nagai T, Alqallaf H, Lin W Dent J (Basel). 2025; 13(1).

PMID: 39851589 PMC: 11763855. DOI: 10.3390/dj13010013.


Revolutionizing Acute Stroke Care: A Review of Food and Drug Administration-Approved Software as Medical Devices for Stroke Triage.

Haq M, Derhab M, Saeed R, Khan H, Mushhood Ur Rehman M Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e74686.

PMID: 39735151 PMC: 11681945. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.74686.


Advancements in Clinical Evaluation and Regulatory Frameworks for AI-Driven Software as a Medical Device (SaMD).

Yang S, Chien J, Lee C IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. 2024; 6:147-151.

PMID: 39698124 PMC: 11655112. DOI: 10.1109/OJEMB.2024.3485534.


Lessons for local oversight of AI in medicine from the regulation of clinical laboratory testing.

Herman D, Reece J, Weissman G NPJ Digit Med. 2024; 7(1):359.

PMID: 39672919 PMC: 11645404. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-024-01369-1.


References
1.
Danziger S, Levav J, Avnaim-Pesso L . Extraneous factors in judicial decisions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(17):6889-92. PMC: 3084045. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1018033108. View

2.
Babic B, Gerke S, Evgeniou T, Cohen I . Algorithms on regulatory lockdown in medicine. Science. 2019; 366(6470):1202-1204. DOI: 10.1126/science.aay9547. View

3.
Tversky A, Kahneman D . Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science. 1974; 185(4157):1124-31. DOI: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124. View

4.
Shah P, Kendall F, Khozin S, Goosen R, Hu J, Laramie J . Artificial intelligence and machine learning in clinical development: a translational perspective. NPJ Digit Med. 2019; 2:69. PMC: 6659652. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-019-0148-3. View

5.
Emanuel E, Wachter R . Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: Will the Value Match the Hype?. JAMA. 2019; 321(23):2281-2282. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.4914. View