Factors Underlying Clinicians' Judgements of Patient Insight and Confidence in Using Clinical Judgement in Psycho-legal Settings

Overview

Journal Psychiatr Psychol Law

Date 2020 Apr 15

PMID 32284782

Authors

Dylan P Galloghly

Greg E Dear

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

This study investigates the factors that clinicians use to make clinical judgements of insight and their confidence in using clinical judgement across three clinical and forensic assessment domains. The 12 participating clinicians rated 30 DVD vignettes of psychiatric patients with a psychotic disorder. Qualitative analyses revealed eight themes that align closely with the dimensions of insight reported in the literature. However, it is unclear how clinicians weigh each dimension. The clinicians were more confident in making a judgement on insight for treatment planning than for involuntary treatment or fitness to stand trial evaluations. They wanted more information when making a judgement in the forensic domains, recognising the greater consequences for the patients and the greater level of scrutiny of their judgements in legal settings compared to clinical settings. The data obtained suggest that both clinical and forensic assessment of insight would benefit from empirically derived structured professional judgement (SPJ) tools.

References

Abidin Z, Davoren M, Naughton L, Gibbons O, Nulty A, Kennedy H . Susceptibility (risk and protective) factors for in-patient violence and self-harm: prospective study of structured professional judgement instruments START and SAPROF, DUNDRUM-3 and DUNDRUM-4 in forensic mental health services. BMC Psychiatry. 2013; 13:197. PMC: 3727954. DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-197. View

OSKAMP S . OVERCONFIDENCE IN CASE-STUDY JUDGMENTS. J Consult Psychol. 1965; 29:261-5. DOI: 10.1037/h0022125. View

Baier M, DeShay E, Owens K, Robinson M, Lasar K, Peterson K . The relationship between insight and clinical factors for persons with schizophrenia. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2001; 14(6):259-65. DOI: 10.1053/apnu.2000.19088. View

Daleiden E, Chorpita B, Kollins S, Drabman R . Factors affecting the reliability of clinical judgments about the function of children's school-refusal behavior. J Clin Child Psychol. 1999; 28(3):396-406. DOI: 10.1207/S15374424jccp280312. View

Nadler I, Globus O, Pessach-Gelblum L, Strauss Z, Sela R, Ziv A . Applying Judgment Analysis Theory and Methods to Obtain an Insight Into Clinical Judgments: Implementation and Findings With a Simulated Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Setup. Simul Healthc. 2016; 11(3):200-8. DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000144. View

Castle D, Jablensky A, McGrath J, Carr V, Morgan V, Waterreus A . The diagnostic interview for psychoses (DIP): development, reliability and applications. Psychol Med. 2005; 36(1):69-80. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291705005969. View

Schwartz R . Insight and illness in chronic schizophrenia. Compr Psychiatry. 1998; 39(5):249-54. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-440x(98)90031-1. View

Grisso T, Appelbaum P, Mulvey E, Fletcher K . The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study. II: Measures of abilities related to competence to consent to treatment. Law Hum Behav. 1995; 19(2):127-48. DOI: 10.1007/BF01499322. View

Amador X, Flaum M, Andreasen N, Strauss D, Yale S, Clark S . Awareness of illness in schizophrenia and schizoaffective and mood disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1994; 51(10):826-36. DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950100074007. View

10.

Hjortso S, Butler B, Clemmesen L, Jepsen P, Kastrup M, Vilmar T . The use of case vignettes in studies of interrater reliability of psychiatric target syndromes and diagnoses. A comparison of ICD-8, ICD-10 and DSM-III. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1989; 80(6):632-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1989.tb03036.x. View

11.

Garb H . Clinical judgment, clinical training, and professional experience. Psychol Bull. 1989; 105(3):387-96. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.387. View

12.

Markova I, Berrios G . The assessment of insight in clinical psychiatry: a new scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1992; 86(2):159-64. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1992.tb03245.x. View

13.

Appelbaum P, Grisso T . The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study. I: Mental illness and competence to consent to treatment. Law Hum Behav. 1995; 19(2):105-26. DOI: 10.1007/BF01499321. View

14.

David A . Insight and psychosis. Br J Psychiatry. 1990; 156:798-808. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.156.6.798. View

15.

Hallmayer J, Jablensky A, Michie P, Woodbury M, Salmon B, Combrinck J . Linkage analysis of candidate regions using a composite neurocognitive phenotype correlated with schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry. 2003; 8(5):511-23. DOI: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001273. View

16.

Body R, Cook G, Burrows G, Carley S, Lewis P . Can emergency physicians 'rule in' and 'rule out' acute myocardial infarction with clinical judgement?. Emerg Med J. 2014; 31(11):872-6. DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2014-203832. View

17.

Galloghly D, Dear G, Jablensky A . Reliability of clinical judgements of insight in patients with psychoses. Psychiatry Res. 2013; 208(3):291-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.03.016. View

18.

Carlton E, Than M, Cullen L, Khattab A, Greaves K . 'Chest pain typicality' in suspected acute coronary syndromes and the impact of clinical experience. Am J Med. 2015; 128(10):1109-1116.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.04.012. View

19.

McGorry P, McConville S . Insight in psychosis: an elusive target. Compr Psychiatry. 1999; 40(2):131-42. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-440x(99)90117-7. View

20.

Diesfeld K, Sjostrom S . Interpretive flexibility: why doesn't insight incite controversy in mental health law?. Behav Sci Law. 2006; 25(1):85-101. DOI: 10.1002/bsl.705. View