» Articles » PMID: 32277006

Prostate Cancer Incidence and Aggressiveness in Appalachia Versus Non-Appalachia Populations in Pennsylvania by Urban-Rural Regions, 2004-2014

Overview
Date 2020 Apr 12
PMID 32277006
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Few studies have examined prostate cancer incidence and aggressiveness in urban-rural Appalachian populations. We examined these rates in urban-rural Appalachia and non-Appalachia Pennsylvania (PA), and the association between these areas and more aggressive prostate cancer at diagnosis.

Methods: Men, ages ≥ 40 years with a primary prostate cancer diagnosis, were identified from the 2004-2014 Pennsylvania Cancer Registry. Age-adjusted incidence rates for prostate cancer and more aggressive prostate cancer at diagnosis were calculated by urban-rural Appalachia status. Multivariable Poisson regressions were conducted. Multiple logistic regressions were used to examine the association between the geographic areas and more aggressive prostate cancer, after adjusting for confounders.

Results: There were 94,274 cases, ages 40-105 years, included. Urban non-Appalachia had the highest 2004-2014 age-adjusted incidence rates of prostate cancer and more aggressive prostate cancer (293.56 and 96.39 per 100,000 men, respectively) and rural Appalachia had the lowest rates (256.48 and 80.18 per 100,000 men, respectively). Among the cases, urban Appalachia were more likely [OR = 1.12; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.08-1.17] and rural Appalachia were less likely (OR = 0.92; 95% CI = 0.87-0.97) to have more aggressive prostate cancer at diagnosis compared with urban non-Appalachia.

Conclusions: Lower incidence rates and the proportion of aggressive disease in rural Appalachia may be due to lower prostate cancer screening rates. More aggressive prostate cancer at diagnosis among the cases in urban Appalachia may be due to exposures that are prevalent in the region.

Impact: Identifying geographic prostate cancer disparities will provide information to design programs aimed at reducing risk and closing the disparity gap.

Citing Articles

An exploratory analysis of the impact of area-level exposome on geographic disparities in aggressive prostate cancer.

Wiese D, DuBois T, Sorice K, Fang C, Ragin C, Daly M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):16900.

PMID: 39075110 PMC: 11286755. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-63726-0.


Navigation-Based Telehealth Informed Decision-Making for Prostate Cancer Screening in Black Men.

Ba D, Kayembe C, Littlejohn J, Van Scoy L, VanDyke E, Williams J Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(7):3698-3712.

PMID: 39057145 PMC: 11275421. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31070273.


Spatial-temporal Bayesian accelerated failure time models for survival endpoints with applications to prostate cancer registry data.

Wang M, Li Z, Lu J, Zhang L, Li Y, Zhang L BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024; 24(1):86.

PMID: 38589783 PMC: 11003030. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-024-02201-w.


LionVu: A Data-Driven Geographical Web-GIS Tool for Community Health and Decision-Making in a Catchment Area.

Geyer N, Lengerich E Geographies. 2023; 3(2):286-302.

PMID: 37994315 PMC: 10665118. DOI: 10.3390/geographies3020015.


Sociodemographic and Geographic Disparities of Prostate Cancer Treatment Delay in Tennessee: A Population-Based Study.

Montiel Ishino F, Odame E, Villalobos K, Rowan C, Whiteside M, Mamudu H Am J Mens Health. 2021; 15(6):15579883211057990.

PMID: 34836465 PMC: 8646205. DOI: 10.1177/15579883211057990.


References
1.
Mueller G, Clayton A, Zahnd W, Hollenbeck K, Barrow M, Jenkins W . Manuscript title: Geospatial analysis of Cancer risk and residential proximity to coal mines in Illinois. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2015; 120:155-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.05.037. View

2.
Li J, Siegel D, King J . Stage-specific incidence rates and trends of prostate cancer by age, race, and ethnicity, United States, 2004-2014. Ann Epidemiol. 2018; 28(5):328-330. PMC: 6080305. DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.03.001. View

3.
Hall H, Uhler R, Coughlin S, Miller D . Breast and cervical cancer screening among Appalachian women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002; 11(1):137-42. View

4.
Myint Z, ONeal R, Chen Q, Huang B, Vanderpool R, Wang P . Disparities in prostate cancer survival in Appalachian Kentucky: a population-based study. Rural Remote Health. 2019; 19(2):4989. DOI: 10.22605/RRH4989. View

5.
Klein R, Schoenborn C . Age adjustment using the 2000 projected U.S. population. Healthy People 2010 Stat Notes. 2001; (20):1-10. View