» Articles » PMID: 32272969

Contact-Force-Sensing-Based Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardias (COBRA-PATH): a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Journal Trials
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2020 Apr 11
PMID 32272969
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Multiple studies have demonstrated the importance of adequate catheter-tissue contact in the creation of effective lesions during radiofrequency catheter ablation. The development of contact force (CF)-sensing catheters has contributed significantly to improve clinical outcomes in atrial fibrillation. However, CF-sensing technology is not used in the ablation of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT). The possible reason for this is that PSVT ablation with the conventional approach (i.e. nonirrigated, non-CF-sensing catheters) is considered a relatively low-risk procedure with fairly high success rates (short and long term). The aim of this study is to determine whether CF sensing can further improve the outcomes of PSVT ablation.

Methods/design: The COBRA-PATH study is a single-center, two-armed, randomized controlled trial. Patients without structural heart disease being referred for electrophysiology study, because of PSVT and potential treatment with radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation, will be randomly assigned to either manual ablation with standard nonirrigated ablation catheters or manual ablation with an open-irrigated ablation catheter equipped with CF sensing (used in a virtual nonirrigated modus). The primary study endpoint is the difference in the number of RF applications during the ablation of atrioventricular nodal re-entry tachycardia, and that of Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia. Secondary outcome parameters include acute and long-term procedural success rates, overall duration of RF applications, procedure/fluoroscopy durations and safety parameters.

Discussion: We expect to see a reduced number/duration of RF applications required to achieve effective lesion creation, and consequently a decrease in total procedure/fluoroscopy times. Although a significant improvement in procedural success rates (acute/long term) might not be feasible to demonstrate (given the relatively high success rate of the standard ablation method), the possible decrease in procedure duration and the consequential reduction of radiation exposure has important clinical implications for both operators and patients undergoing the procedure.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials, NCT04078685. Retrospectively registered on 2 September 2019.

Citing Articles

Recent Advances in the Management of Non-rheumatic Atrial Fibrillation: A Comprehensive Review.

Kadam A, Kotak P, Khurana K, Toshniwal S, Daiya V, Raut S Cureus. 2024; 16(7):e65835.

PMID: 39219967 PMC: 11363501. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.65835.


Role of oesophageal cooling in the prevention of oesophageal injury in atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Hamed M, Elseidy S, Abdelazeem M, Morcos R, Abdallah A, Sammour Y Europace. 2023; 25(5).

PMID: 37021812 PMC: 10227763. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euad080.


Deep-Learning-Based Detection of Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia Using Sinus-Rhythm Electrocardiograms.

Wang L, Dang S, Chen S, Sun J, Wang R, Pan F J Clin Med. 2022; 11(15).

PMID: 35956195 PMC: 9369533. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11154578.

References
1.
Sigmund E, Puererfellner H, Derndorfer M, Kollias G, Winter S, Aichinger J . Optimizing radiofrequency ablation of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation by direct catheter force measurement-a case-matched comparison in 198 patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014; 38(2):201-8. DOI: 10.1111/pace.12549. View

2.
Neuzil P, Reddy V, Kautzner J, Petru J, Wichterle D, Shah D . Electrical reconnection after pulmonary vein isolation is contingent on contact force during initial treatment: results from the EFFICAS I study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013; 6(2):327-33. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000374. View

3.
Casella M, Dello Russo A, Russo E, Al-Mohani G, Santangeli P, Riva S . Biomarkers of myocardial injury with different energy sources for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation. Cardiol J. 2013; 21(5):516-23. DOI: 10.5603/CJ.a2013.0153. View

4.
Kuck K, Reddy V, Schmidt B, Natale A, Neuzil P, Saoudi N . A novel radiofrequency ablation catheter using contact force sensing: Toccata study. Heart Rhythm. 2011; 9(1):18-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.08.021. View

5.
Sciarra L, Golia P, Natalizia A, De Ruvo E, Dottori S, Scara A . Which is the best catheter to perform atrial fibrillation ablation? A comparison between standard ThermoCool, SmartTouch, and Surround Flow catheters. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014; 39(3):193-200. DOI: 10.1007/s10840-014-9874-2. View