» Articles » PMID: 32272959

Misoprostol Administered Sublingually at a Dose of 12.5 μg Versus Vaginally at a Dose of 25 μg for the Induction of Full-term Labor: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Journal Reprod Health
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2020 Apr 11
PMID 32272959
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Labor induction is defined as any procedure that stimulates uterine contractions before labor begins spontaneously. The vaginal and oral routes of administration of misoprostol are those most used for the induction of labor in routine practice, with the recommended dose being 25 μg. Nevertheless, the sublingual route may reduce the number of vaginal examinations required, increasing patient comfort and lowering the risk of maternal and fetal infection. Based on a previous systematic review, the objective of this study was to compare the frequency of tachysystole as the main outcome measure when misoprostol is administered sublingually at the dose of 12.5 μg versus vaginally at a dose of 25 μg to induce labor in a full-term pregnancy with a live fetus.

Methods: A randomized, placebo-controlled, triple-blind clinical trial was conducted at two maternity hospitals in northeastern Brazil. Two hundred patients with a full-term pregnancy, a live fetus, Bishop score ≤ 6 and an indication for induction of labor were included. Following randomization, one group received 12.5 μg misoprostol sublingually and a vaginal placebo, while the other group received a sublingual placebo and 25 μg misoprostol vaginally. The primary outcome was the frequency of tachysystole. Student's t-test, the chi-square test of association and Fisher's exact test were used, as appropriate. Risk ratios and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated.

Results: The frequency of tachysystole was lower in the group using 12.5 μg misoprostol sublingually compared to the group using 25 μg misoprostol vaginally (RR = 0.15; 95%CI: 0.02-0.97; p = 0.002). Failure to achieve vaginal delivery within 12 and 24 h was similar in both groups. Sublingual administration was preferred to vaginal administration by women in both groups; however, the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: The effectiveness of labor induction with low-dose sublingual misoprostol was similar to that achieved with vaginal administration of the recommended dose; however, the rate of tachysystole was lower in the sublingual group, and this route of administration may prove a safe alternative.

Trial Registration: Registration number: NCT01406392, ClinicalTrials.gov. Date of registration: August 1, 2011.

Citing Articles

Results of Induction of Labor with Prostaglandins E1 and E2 (The RIPE Study): A Real-World Data Analysis of Obstetrical Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes of Pharmacological Induction of Labor with Vaginal Inserts.

Socha M, Flis W, Pietrus M, Wartega M Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023; 16(7).

PMID: 37513894 PMC: 10384291. DOI: 10.3390/ph16070982.


Labor induction with randomized comparison of cervical, oral and intravaginal misoprostol.

Dadashaliha M, Fallah S, Mirzadeh M BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021; 21(1):721.

PMID: 34706675 PMC: 8549163. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-04196-4.

References
1.
Ten Eikelder M, Oude Rengerink K, Jozwiak M, de Leeuw J, de Graaf I, van Pampus M . Induction of labour at term with oral misoprostol versus a Foley catheter (PROBAAT-II): a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2016; 387(10028):1619-28. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00084-2. View

2.
Caliskan E, Bodur H, Ozeren S, Corakci A, Ozkan S, Yucesoy I . Misoprostol 50 microg sublingually versus vaginally for labor induction at term: a randomized study. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2005; 59(3):155-61. DOI: 10.1159/000083255. View

3.
Dias M, Domingues R, Schilithz A, Nakamura-Pereira M, Leal M . Factors associated with cesarean delivery during labor in primiparous women assisted in the Brazilian Public Health System: data from a National Survey. Reprod Health. 2016; 13(Suppl 3):114. PMC: 5073796. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-016-0231-z. View

4.
Guerra G, Cecatti J, Souza J, Faundes A, Morais S, Gulmezoglu A . Factors and outcomes associated with the induction of labour in Latin America. BJOG. 2009; 116(13):1762-72. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02348.x. View

5.
. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles. Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 114(1):192-202. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181aef106. View