» Articles » PMID: 32271892

A Comparison of the Temporal and Spatial Properties of Trans-saccadic Perceptual Recalibration and Saccadic Adaptation

Overview
Journal J Vis
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2020 Apr 10
PMID 32271892
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Repeated exposure to a consistent trans-saccadic step in the position of the saccadic target reliably produces a change of saccadic gain, a well-established trans-saccadic motor learning phenomenon known as saccadic adaptation. Trans-saccadic changes can also produce perceptual effects. Specifically, a systematic increase or decrease in the size of the object that is being foveated changes the perceptually equivalent size between fovea and periphery. Previous studies have shown that this recalibration of perceived size can be established within a few dozen trials, persists overnight, and generalizes across hemifields. In the current study, we use a novel adjustment paradigm to characterize both temporally and spatially the learning process that subtends this form of recalibration, and directly compare its properties to those of saccadic adaptation. We observed that sinusoidal oscillations in the amplitude of the trans-saccadic change produce sinusoidal oscillations in the reported peripheral size, with a lag of under 10 trials. This is qualitatively similar to what has been observed in the case of saccadic adaptation. We also tested whether learning is generalized to the mirror location on the opposite hemifield for both size recalibration and saccade adaptation. Here the results were markedly different, showing almost complete generalization for recalibration and no generalization for saccadic adaptation. We conclude that perceptual and visuomotor consequences of trans-saccadic changes rely on learning mechanisms that are distinct but develop on similar time scales.

Citing Articles

Perceptual learning across saccades: Feature but not location specific.

Grzeczkowski L, Shi Z, Rolfs M, Deubel H Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(43):e2303763120.

PMID: 37844238 PMC: 10614914. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2303763120.


The influence of action on perception spans different effectors.

Bosco A, Sanz Diez P, Filippini M, Fattori P Front Syst Neurosci. 2023; 17:1145643.

PMID: 37205054 PMC: 10185787. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2023.1145643.


Familiar objects benefit more from transsaccadic feature predictions.

Goktepe N, Schutz A Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023; 85(6):1949-1961.

PMID: 36720784 PMC: 10545618. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02651-8.


What determines location specificity or generalization of transsaccadic learning?.

Osterbrink C, Herwig A J Vis. 2023; 23(1):8.

PMID: 36648417 PMC: 9851281. DOI: 10.1167/jov.23.1.8.


Mislocalization after inhibition of saccadic adaptation.

Heins F, Lappe M J Vis. 2022; 22(8):3.

PMID: 35834378 PMC: 9290319. DOI: 10.1167/jov.22.8.3.


References
1.
Semmlow J, Gauthier G, Vercher J . Mechanisms of short-term saccadic adaptation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1989; 15(2):249-58. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.15.2.249. View

2.
Valsecchi M, Koenderink J, van Doorn A, Gegenfurtner K . Prediction shapes peripheral appearance. J Vis. 2018; 18(13):21. DOI: 10.1167/18.13.21. View

3.
Galvin S, OShea R, Squire A, Hailstone D . Sharpness overconstancy: the roles of visibility and current context. Vision Res. 1999; 39(16):2649-57. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00306-x. View

4.
Zimmermann E, Lappe M . Mislocalization of flashed and stationary visual stimuli after adaptation of reactive and scanning saccades. J Neurosci. 2009; 29(35):11055-64. PMC: 6665523. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1604-09.2009. View

5.
Rovamo J, Franssila R, Nasanen R . Contrast sensitivity as a function of spatial frequency, viewing distance and eccentricity with and without spatial noise. Vision Res. 1992; 32(4):631-7. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(92)90179-m. View