» Articles » PMID: 32267771

The REMAP-CAP (Randomized Embedded Multifactorial Adaptive Platform for Community-acquired Pneumonia) Study. Rationale and Design

Abstract

There is broad interest in improved methods to generate robust evidence regarding best practice, especially in settings where patient conditions are heterogenous and require multiple concomitant therapies. Here, we present the rationale and design of a large, international trial that combines features of adaptive platform trials with pragmatic point-of-care trials to determine best treatment strategies for patients admitted to an intensive care unit with severe community-acquired pneumonia. The trial uses a novel design, entitled "a randomized embedded multifactorial adaptive platform." The design has five key features: ) randomization, allowing robust causal inference; ) embedding of study procedures into routine care processes, facilitating enrollment, trial efficiency, and generalizability; ) a multifactorial statistical model comparing multiple interventions across multiple patient subgroups; ) response-adaptive randomization with preferential assignment to those interventions that appear most favorable; and ) a platform structured to permit continuous, potentially perpetual enrollment beyond the evaluation of the initial treatments. The trial randomizes patients to multiple interventions within four treatment domains: antibiotics, antiviral therapy for influenza, host immunomodulation with extended macrolide therapy, and alternative corticosteroid regimens, representing 240 treatment regimens. The trial generates estimates of superiority, inferiority, and equivalence between regimens on the primary outcome of 90-day mortality, stratified by presence or absence of concomitant shock and proven or suspected influenza infection. The trial will also compare ventilatory and oxygenation strategies, and has capacity to address additional questions rapidly during pandemic respiratory infections. As of January 2020, REMAP-CAP (Randomized Embedded Multifactorial Adaptive Platform for Community-acquired Pneumonia) was approved and enrolling patients in 52 intensive care units in 13 countries on 3 continents. In February, it transitioned into pandemic mode with several design adaptations for coronavirus disease 2019. Lessons learned from the design and conduct of this trial should aid in dissemination of similar platform initiatives in other disease areas.Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02735707).

Citing Articles

Statistical documentation for multi-disease, multi-domain platform trials: our experience with the Staphylococcus aureus Network Adaptive Platform trial.

Mahar R, McGlothlin A, Dymock M, Barina L, Bonten M, Bowen A Trials. 2025; 26(1):49.

PMID: 39934879 PMC: 11817021. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08684-8.


Why and how should we simulate platform trials? Learnings from EU-PEARL.

Meyer E, Mielke T, Bofill Roig M, Freitag M, Jacko P, Krotka P BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025; 25(1):12.

PMID: 39819305 PMC: 11740366. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-024-02453-6.


Treatment of Complicated Gram-Positive Bacteremia and Infective Endocarditis.

Schellong P, Joean O, Pletz M, Hagel S, Weis S Drugs. 2024; 85(2):193-214.

PMID: 39720961 PMC: 11802659. DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02135-z.


Adaptive Platform Trials in Stroke.

Lorenzi E, Crawford A, Anderson C, Menon B, Chen X, Mistry E Stroke. 2024; 56(1):198-208.

PMID: 39705391 PMC: 11665893. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.045754.


Global collaboration between platform trials in surgery and anaesthesia.

Glasbey J, Webb S, Peel T, Pinkney T, Myles P Br J Surg. 2024; 111(12).

PMID: 39701591 PMC: 11658830. DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae262.


References
1.
. An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329(10):673-82. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199309023291001. View

2.
Webb S, Pettila V, Seppelt I, Bellomo R, Bailey M, Cooper D . Critical care services and 2009 H1N1 influenza in Australia and New Zealand. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(20):1925-34. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908481. View

3.
Mortensen E, Restrepo M, Anzueto A, Pugh J . Effects of guideline-concordant antimicrobial therapy on mortality among patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Am J Med. 2004; 117(10):726-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.06.028. View

4.
Musher D, Thorner A . Community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371(17):1619-28. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1312885. View

5.
Rubin B, Druce H, Ramirez O, Palmer R . Effect of clarithromycin on nasal mucus properties in healthy subjects and in patients with purulent rhinitis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997; 155(6):2018-23. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.155.6.9196110. View