YouTube As a Source of Information About the Posterior Cruciate Ligament: A Content-Quality and Reliability Analysis

Overview

Journal Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil

Date 2020 Apr 9

PMID 32266347

Citations 33

Authors

Kyle N Kunze

Matthew R Cohn

Connor Wakefield

Fadi Hamati

Robert F LaPrade

Brian Forsythe

Adam B Yanke

Jorge Chahla

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and educational content of YouTube videos concerning injuries to the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) of the knee.

Methods: The first 50 videos specific to the PCL identified through the YouTube query were evaluated by a method of video selection demonstrated to be feasible in prior YouTube studies. Videos were classified by content and upload source. Video reliability was assessed using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria (score range 0-5). Video educational content was assessed using the Global Quality Score (GQS) (range 0-4) and the PCL Score (PCLS) (score range 0-18). Analysis of variance was used to determine differences in video reliability and educational content quality based on video content and upload source. Multivariate linear regressions were used to identify predictors of video reliability and educational content quality.

Results: The mean number of views per video was 50,477.9 ± 15,036. Collectively, the 50 videos were viewed 14,141,285 times. Video content was classified primarily as information about disease (62.0%). The most common upload sources were physicians (24.0%) and nonphysician health care providers (26.0%). Significant between-group interactions were found between video source and the JAMA score, with physicians and medical sources having significantly higher mean JAMA scores ( = 0.037). Videos uploaded by physicians were an independent positive predictor of greater JAMA scores (β:1.27; = 0.008). Videos uploaded by a medical source (β:2.06; = 0.038) were an independent positive predictor of a greater GQS. There were no independent associations between video content category or upload source and the PCLS.

Conclusions: Videos concerning the PCL were frequently viewed on YouTube, but the educational quality and reliability of these videos were low.

Clinical Relevance: Physicians and health care providers treating PCL pathology should take the initiative to counsel patients about which outside resources are reliable to better inform patients about their treatment decisions. With regard to YouTube videos specifically, providers should caution their patients that this source of information may be unreliable.

Citing Articles

Quality and Reliability Analysis of YouTube as a Source of Patient Information on de Quervain's Tenosynovitis.

Kim J, Hoy J, Shuman S, Ahmad F, Simcock X J Wrist Surg. 2025; 14(1):42-48.

PMID: 39896907 PMC: 11781845. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1777017.

YouTube as a Source of Patient Information for Cervical Spine Fractures: A Content Quality and Audience Engagement Analysis.

Krakowiak M, Piwowska K, Fercho J, Yuser R, Jagodzinski M, Kokot K Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 12(24.

PMID: 39765919 PMC: 11728221. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12242492.

Quality Assessment of YouTube Videos As Information Source for Breast Self-Examination.

Bu Bshait M, Almaqhawi A Cureus. 2024; 16(9):e70227.

PMID: 39463531 PMC: 11512166. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.70227.

Quality and Reliability Analysis of YouTube as a Source for Patient Education on Dupuytren's Contracture.

Hoy J, Kim J, Smith S, Simcock X J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2024; 6(3):313-318.

PMID: 38817746 PMC: 11133799. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.01.006.

The Potential of ChatGPT for High-Quality Information in Patient Education for Sports Surgery.

Yuce A, Erkurt N, Yerli M, Misir A Cureus. 2024; 16(4):e58874.

PMID: 38800159 PMC: 11116739. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58874.

References

Wong D, Cheung M . Online Health Information Seeking and eHealth Literacy Among Patients Attending a Primary Care Clinic in Hong Kong: A Cross-Sectional Survey. J Med Internet Res. 2019; 21(3):e10831. PMC: 6456826. DOI: 10.2196/10831. View

Fanelli G . Posterior cruciate ligament injuries in trauma patients. Arthroscopy. 1993; 9(3):291-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-8063(05)80424-4. View

Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V, Minhas D, Eure M, Kats M . Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public's response to medical videos on YouTube. PLoS One. 2013; 8(12):e82469. PMC: 3867348. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082469. View

Staunton P, Baker J, Green J, Devitt A . Online Curves: A Quality Analysis of Scoliosis Videos on YouTube. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015; 40(23):1857-61. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001137. View

Silberg W, LUNDBERG G, Musacchio R . Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA. 1997; 277(15):1244-5. View

Brooks F, Lawrence H, Jones A, McCarthy M . YouTube™ as a source of patient information for lumbar discectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2014; 96(2):144-6. PMC: 4474244. DOI: 10.1308/003588414X13814021676396. View

Schulz M, Russe K, Weiler A, EICHHORN H, Strobel M . Epidemiology of posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003; 123(4):186-91. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-002-0471-y. View

Wind Jr W, Bergfeld J, Parker R . Evaluation and treatment of posterior cruciate ligament injuries: revisited. Am J Sports Med. 2004; 32(7):1765-75. DOI: 10.1177/0363546504270481. View

Erdem M, Karaca S . Evaluating the Accuracy and Quality of the Information in Kyphosis Videos Shared on YouTube. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018; 43(22):E1334-E1339. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002691. View

10.

Ayeni O, Chan K, Al-Asiri J, Chien T, Sprague S, Liew S . Sources and quality of literature addressing femoroacetabular impingement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012; 21(2):415-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-2236-7. View

11.

Singh A, Singh S, Paul Singh P . YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis--a wakeup call?. J Rheumatol. 2012; 39(5):899-903. DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.111114. View

12.

Sanders T, Pareek A, Barrett I, Kremers H, Bryan A, Stuart M . Incidence and long-term follow-up of isolated posterior cruciate ligament tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016; 25(10):3017-3023. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4052-y. View

13.

Wang D, Jayakar R, Leong N, Leathers M, Williams R, Jones K . Evaluation of the Quality, Accuracy, and Readability of Online Patient Resources for the Management of Articular Cartilage Defects. Cartilage. 2017; 8(2):112-118. PMC: 5358824. DOI: 10.1177/1947603516648737. View

14.

Cassidy J, Fitzgerald E, Cassidy E, Cleary M, Byrne D, Devitt B . YouTube provides poor information regarding anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017; 26(3):840-845. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-017-4514-x. View

15.

Bedi A, Musahl V, Cowan J . Management of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: An Evidence-Based Review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016; 24(5):277-89. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00326. View

16.

Murugiah K, Vallakati A, Rajput K, Sood A, Challa N . YouTube as a source of information on cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2010; 82(3):332-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.11.015. View

17.

Curry E, Li X, Nguyen J, Matzkin E . Prevalence of internet and social media usage in orthopedic surgery. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2014; 6(3):5483. PMC: 4195991. DOI: 10.4081/or.2014.5483. View

18.

Koller U, Waldstein W, Schatz K, Windhager R . YouTube provides irrelevant information for the diagnosis and treatment of hip arthritis. Int Orthop. 2016; 40(10):1995-2002. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-016-3174-7. View

19.

Bahadir Gokcen H, Gumussuyu G . A Quality Analysis of Disc Herniation Videos on YouTube. World Neurosurg. 2019; 124:e799-e804. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.146. View

20.

Addar A, Marwan Y, Algarni N, Berry G . Assessment of "YouTube" Content for Distal Radius Fracture Immobilization. J Surg Educ. 2017; 74(5):799-804. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.03.002. View