» Articles » PMID: 32266278

Major Factors Affecting the Live Birth Rate After Frozen Embryo Transfer Among Young Women

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2020 Apr 9
PMID 32266278
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In recent years, the freeze-all strategy has been widely adopted and applied. However, with the exception of age, the factors that affect the outcomes of frozen embryo transfer are still unclear. Therefore, the identification and mitigation of factors that influence the live birth rate after frozen embryo transfer is a good way to increase the "take-home-baby" rate of frozen embryo transfer. The objective of this study was to identify factors affecting the live birth rate after cleavage-stage frozen embryo transfer in young ovulatory women. This was a secondary analysis from a previously published multicenter randomized controlled trial (ChiCTR-IOR-14005406) that was originally designed to compare the live birth rate and perinatal complications after fresh embryo transfer to those after frozen embryo transfer among ovulatory women. This study was carried out using a portion of the data from the original randomized controlled trial, which included 917 young women who underwent cleavage-stage frozen embryo transfer. The 16 clinical candidate variables potentially affecting the live birth rate after frozen embryo transfer were analyzed. Univariable analysis and multivariable analysis were performed to assess the relationship between predictive factors and outcomes, with the aim of identifying independent predictors of live birth after frozen embryo transfer. In this study, the live birth rate was 53.0% (486/917). Three independent predictors were ultimately identified as the main factors affecting the live birth rate of ovulatory young women. Infertility duration [odds ratio (OR): 0.933, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.876-0.995, = 0.033], endometrial thickness before frozen embryo transfer (OR: 3.375, 95% CI: 1.556-7.321 = 0.002), and the number of embryos transferred (OR: 2.653, 95% CI:1.226-5,743, = 0.013) were the major factors contributing to the live birth rate after cleavage-stage frozen embryo transfer among young women. The cut-off point for infertility duration was 4.5 years, and the cut-off point for endometrial thickness was 0.89 cm. Infertility duration, endometrial thickness and number of embryos transferred might affect the live birth rate after frozen embryo transfer among young women. This result could help inform clinical decisions and counseling to increase the live birth rate after frozen embryo transfer among young women.

Citing Articles

Nomogram to predict cumulative live birth rate following in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles in patients with endometriosis.

Zhu L, Lin T, Yang X, Zhang D BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025; 25(1):38.

PMID: 39825231 PMC: 11740517. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-025-07147-5.


Does hCG-trigger in the mild stimulation protocol for endometrial preparation have any effect on pregnancy outcome in frozen-thawed embryo transfer?.

Kashi S, Arabipoor A, Zolfaghari Z, Movaghar B, Rostami H, Hafezi M Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024; 22(1):128.

PMID: 39425116 PMC: 11488363. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-024-01301-y.


Large-scale retrospective analysis of methodological factors affecting pregnancy rates after embryo transfer for in vitro fertilization.

Kavrut M, Sagir F, Atayurt Z Medicine (Baltimore). 2023; 102(36):e35146.

PMID: 37682170 PMC: 10489353. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035146.


Is the length of time between endometrial scratching and embryo transfer important for pregnancy success? An observational study.

Ueno J, Salgado R, Ejzenberg D, Carvalho F, Veiga E, Soares Junior J Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023; 69(1):72-77.

PMID: 36820716 PMC: 9937610. DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.20220690.


Association of the Cumulative Live Birth Rate with the Factors in Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Retrospective Study of 16,583 Women.

Wang Q, Qi D, Zhang L, Wang J, Du Y, Lv H J Clin Med. 2023; 12(2).

PMID: 36675422 PMC: 9862593. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12020493.


References
1.
Shi Y, Sun Y, Hao C, Zhang H, Wei D, Zhang Y . Transfer of Fresh versus Frozen Embryos in Ovulatory Women. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378(2):126-136. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1705334. View

2.
Vuong L, Dang V, Ho T, Huynh B, Ha D, Pham T . IVF Transfer of Fresh or Frozen Embryos in Women without Polycystic Ovaries. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378(2):137-147. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1703768. View

3.
Ashrafi M, Jahangiri N, Hassani F, Akhoond M, Madani T . The factors affecting the outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 50(2):159-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2011.01.037. View

4.
Kawamura T, Motoyama H, Yanaihara A, Yorimitsu T, Arichi A, Karasawa Y . Clinical outcomes of two different endometrial preparation methods for cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer in patients with a normal menstrual cycle. Reprod Med Biol. 2018; 6(1):53-57. PMC: 5906877. DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0578.2007.00165.x. View

5.
Cai Q, Wan F, Huang R, Zhang H . Factors predicting the cumulative outcome of IVF/ICSI treatment: a multivariable analysis of 2450 patients. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26(9):2532-40. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der228. View