» Articles » PMID: 32265008

Understanding Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Risk Perceptions Among the Public to Enhance Risk Communication Efforts: a Practical Approach for Outbreaks, Finland, February 2020

Overview
Journal Euro Surveill
Date 2020 Apr 9
PMID 32265008
Citations 65
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Understanding risk perceptions of the public is critical for risk communication. In February 2020, the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare started collecting weekly qualitative data on coronavirus disease (COVID-19) risk perception that informs risk communication efforts. The process is based on thematic analysis of emails and social media messages from the public and identifies factors linked to appraisal of risk magnitude, which are developed into risk communication recommendations together with health and communication experts.

Citing Articles

Assessment of MPOX infection-related knowledge levels, concerns, and associated factors: a community-based cross-sectional study.

Arayici M, Dolu S, Sayilir H, Simsek H, Kose S BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):172.

PMID: 39815255 PMC: 11737147. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21384-5.


Do first responders and populations perceive risks similarly? A comparative study of seven countries.

Stolero N, Elkady S, Labaka L, Tov M, Peleg K, Adini B Front Psychol. 2024; 14:1219927.

PMID: 38274674 PMC: 10809848. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1219927.


Intersection of Perceived COVID-19 Risk, Preparedness, and Preventive Health Behaviors: Latent Class Segmentation Analysis.

Mgbere O, Iloanusi S, Yunusa I, Iloanusi N, Gohil S, Essien E Online J Public Health Inform. 2023; 15:e50967.

PMID: 38046563 PMC: 10689050. DOI: 10.2196/50967.


Exploring Political Mistrust in Pandemic Risk Communication: Mixed-Method Study Using Social Media Data Analysis.

Unlu A, Truong S, Tammi T, Lohiniva A J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e50199.

PMID: 37862088 PMC: 10625074. DOI: 10.2196/50199.


Communication to promote and support physical distancing for COVID-19 prevention and control.

Ryan R, Silke C, Parkhill A, Virgona A, Merner B, Hurley S Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023; 10:CD015144.

PMID: 37811673 PMC: 10561351. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015144.


References
1.
Reyers B, Nel J, OFarrell P, Sitas N, Nel D . Navigating complexity through knowledge coproduction: Mainstreaming ecosystem services into disaster risk reduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112(24):7362-8. PMC: 4475951. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1414374112. View

2.
Dickmann P, Abraham T, Sarkar S, Wysocki P, Cecconi S, Apfel F . Risk communication as a core public health competence in infectious disease management: Development of the ECDC training curriculum and programme. Euro Surveill. 2016; 21(14). DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.14.30188. View

3.
Glik D . Risk communication for public health emergencies. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007; 28:33-54. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144123. View

4.
Engdahl E, Lidskog R . Risk, communication and trust: towards an emotional understanding of trust. Public Underst Sci. 2014; 23(6):703-17. DOI: 10.1177/0963662512460953. View

5.
Murray S, Manktelow K, Clifford C . The interplay between social and cultural context and perceptions of cardiovascular disease. J Adv Nurs. 2000; 32(5):1224-33. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01593.x. View