» Articles » PMID: 32259556

The Role of the Pre-commissural Fornix in Episodic Autobiographical Memory and Simulation

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Psychology
Date 2020 Apr 8
PMID 32259556
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Neuropsychological and functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence suggests that the ability to vividly remember our personal past, and imagine future scenarios, involves two closely connected regions: the hippocampus and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC). Despite evidence of a direct anatomical connection from hippocampus to vmPFC, it is unknown whether hippocampal-vmPFC structural connectivity supports both past- and future-oriented episodic thinking. To address this, we applied a novel deterministic tractography protocol to diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) data from a group of healthy young adult humans who undertook an adapted past-future autobiographical interview (portions of this data were published in Hodgetts et al., 2017a). This tractography protocol enabled distinct subdivisions of the fornix, detected previously in axonal tracer studies, to be reconstructed in vivo, namely the pre-commissural (connecting the hippocampus to vmPFC) and post-commissural (linking the hippocampus and medial diencephalon) fornix. As predicted, we found that inter-individual differences in pre-commissural - but not post-commissural - fornix microstructure (fractional anisotropy) were significantly correlated with the episodic richness of both past and future autobiographical narratives. Notably, these results held when controlling for non-episodic narrative content, verbal fluency, and grey matter volumes of the hippocampus and vmPFC. This study provides novel evidence that reconstructing events from one's personal past, and constructing possible future events, involves a distinct, structurally-instantiated hippocampal-vmPFC pathway.

Citing Articles

Brain connectivity patterns associated with individual differences in the access to experience-near personal semantics: a resting-state fMRI study.

Teghil A, Boccia M Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024; 24(1):87-99.

PMID: 38200283 PMC: 10827898. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-023-01149-6.


The anterior thalamic nuclei: core components of a tripartite episodic memory system.

Aggleton J, OMara S Nat Rev Neurosci. 2022; 23(8):505-516.

PMID: 35478245 DOI: 10.1038/s41583-022-00591-8.


The fornix supports episodic memory during childhood.

Hoffman L, Ngo C, Canada K, Pasternak O, Zhang F, Riggins T Cereb Cortex. 2022; 32(23):5388-5403.

PMID: 35169831 PMC: 9712741. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhac022.


Individual differences in the relationship between episodic detail generation and resting state functional connectivity vary with age.

Matijevic S, Andrews-Hanna J, Wank A, Ryan L, Grilli M Neuropsychologia. 2021; 166:108138.

PMID: 34968505 PMC: 8816892. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.108138.


Loneliness is linked to specific subregional alterations in hippocampus-default network covariation.

Zajner C, Nathan Spreng R, Bzdok D J Neurophysiol. 2021; 126(6):2138-2157.

PMID: 34817294 PMC: 8715056. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00339.2021.


References
1.
Metzler-Baddeley C, Jones D, Belaroussi B, Aggleton J, OSullivan M . Frontotemporal connections in episodic memory and aging: a diffusion MRI tractography study. J Neurosci. 2011; 31(37):13236-45. PMC: 6623273. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2317-11.2011. View

2.
Robin J . Spatial scaffold effects in event memory and imagination. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2018; 9(4):e1462. DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1462. View

3.
Jbabdi S, Behrens T . Long-range connectomics. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013; 1305:83-93. PMC: 3910152. DOI: 10.1111/nyas.12271. View

4.
Vann S, Erichsen J, OMara S, Aggleton J . Selective disconnection of the hippocampal formation projections to the mammillary bodies produces only mild deficits on spatial memory tasks: implications for fornix function. Hippocampus. 2010; 21(9):945-57. DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20796. View

5.
Jones D, Knosche T, Turner R . White matter integrity, fiber count, and other fallacies: the do's and don'ts of diffusion MRI. Neuroimage. 2012; 73:239-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.081. View