» Articles » PMID: 32257330

Pathogen Avoidance and Prey Discrimination in Ants

Overview
Journal R Soc Open Sci
Specialty Science
Date 2020 Apr 8
PMID 32257330
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Insect societies have developed sanitary strategies, one of which is the avoidance of infectious food resources as a primary line of defence. Using binary choices, we investigated whether ants can identify prey that has been artificially infected with the entomopathogenic fungus, . We compared the ants' foraging behaviour towards infected prey at three different stages of fungus development (i) prey covered with fungal conidia, (ii) prey freshly killed by the fungus and (iii) sporulating prey. Most foragers retrieved a corpse covered with a high number of spores but they consistently avoided a sporulating prey and collected less prey that had recently died from fungal infection. Furthermore, ant responses were highly variable, with some individuals retrieving the first prey they encountered while others inspected both available prey before making a decision. Workers were not repelled by the simple presence of fungal conidia but nevertheless, they avoided retrieving cadavers at later stages of fungal infection. We discuss how these different avoidance responses could be related to: differences in the ants' perceptive abilities; physico-chemical cues characterizing fungus-infected prey or in the existence of physiological or behavioural defences that limit sanitary risks associated with potentially contaminated resources.

Citing Articles

Social organization of necrophoresis: insights into disease risk management in ant societies.

Avanzi Q, Lisart L, Detrain C R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(12):240764.

PMID: 39665101 PMC: 11632371. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.240764.


, gen. nov., sp. nov., a New Sordariaceous Ascomycete in the Indoor Environment, and the Proposal of Hagnosaceae fam. nov.

Magyar D, Tartally A, Merenyi Z Pathogens. 2022; 11(5).

PMID: 35631114 PMC: 9145789. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens11050593.


Antimicrobial Volatiles of the Insect Pathogen .

Hummadi E, Cetin Y, Demirbek M, Kardar N, Khan S, Coates C J Fungi (Basel). 2022; 8(4).

PMID: 35448558 PMC: 9025432. DOI: 10.3390/jof8040326.


A fungus infected environment does not alter the behaviour of foraging ants.

Pereira H, Willeput R, Detrain C Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):23573.

PMID: 34876627 PMC: 8651729. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-02817-8.


Preventing Transmission of Lethal Disease: Removal Behaviour of (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Towards Fungus Contaminated Aphids.

Novgorodova T Insects. 2021; 12(2).

PMID: 33498832 PMC: 7911655. DOI: 10.3390/insects12020099.


References
1.
Mburu D, Ochola L, Maniania N, Njagi P, Gitonga L, Ndungu M . Relationship between virulence and repellency of entomopathogenic isolates of Metarhizium anisopliae and Beauveria bassiana to the termite Macrotermes michaelseni. J Insect Physiol. 2009; 55(9):774-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2009.04.015. View

2.
Cremer S, Pull C, Furst M . Social Immunity: Emergence and Evolution of Colony-Level Disease Protection. Annu Rev Entomol. 2017; 63:105-123. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ento-020117-043110. View

3.
Stroeymeyt N, Casillas-Perez B, Cremer S . Organisational immunity in social insects. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2020; 5:1-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.cois.2014.09.001. View

4.
Richard F, Aubert A, Grozinger C . Modulation of social interactions by immune stimulation in honey bee, Apis mellifera, workers. BMC Biol. 2008; 6:50. PMC: 2596086. DOI: 10.1186/1741-7007-6-50. View

5.
Reber A, Purcell J, Buechel S, Buri P, Chapuisat M . The expression and impact of antifungal grooming in ants. J Evol Biol. 2011; 24(5):954-64. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02230.x. View