» Articles » PMID: 32256585

Somatic Mutations in and Implications for Current Treatment Paradigms in -Positive Breast Cancer

Overview
Journal J Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2020 Apr 8
PMID 32256585
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In one of every four or five cases of breast cancer, the human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 () gene is overexpressed. These carcinomas are known as HER2-positive. HER2 overexpression is linked to an aggressive phenotype and a lower rate of disease-free and overall survival. Drugs such as trastuzumab, pertuzumab, lapatinib, neratinib, and the more recent afatinib target the deregulation of HER2 expression. Some authors have attributed somatic mutations in HER2, a role in resistance to anti-HER2 therapy as differential regulation of HER2 has been observed among patients. Recently, studies in metastatic ER + tumors suggest that some HER2 mutations emerge as a mechanism of acquired resistance to endocrine therapy. In an effort to identify possible biomarkers of the efficacy of anti-HER2 therapy, we here review the known single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the HER2 gene found in HER2-positive breast cancer patients and their relationship with clinical outcomes. Information was recompiled on 11 somatic HER2 SNPs. Seven polymorphisms are located in the tyrosine kinase domain region of the gene contrasting with the low number of mutations found in extracellular and transmembrane areas. HER2-positive patients carrying S310F, S310Y, R678Q, D769H, or I767M mutations seem good candidates for anti-HER2 therapy as they show favorable outcomes and a good response to current pharmacological treatments. Carrying the L755S or D769Y mutation could also confer benefits when receiving neratinib or afatinib. By contrast, patients with mutations L755S, V842I, K753I, or D769Y do not seem to benefit from trastuzumab. Resistance to lapatinib has been reported in patients with L755S, V842I, and K753I. These data suggest that exploring HER2 SNPs in each patient could help individualize anti-HER2 therapies. Advances in our understanding of the genetics of the HER2 gene and its relations with the efficacy of anti-HER2 treatments are needed to improve the outcomes of patients with this aggressive breast cancer.

Citing Articles

Liquid biopsy: Cell-free DNA based analysis in breast cancer.

Venetis K, Cursano G, Pescia C, DErcole M, Porta F, Blanco M J Liq Biopsy. 2025; 1:100002.

PMID: 40027284 PMC: 11863823. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlb.2023.100002.


Lapatinib-induced enhancement of mitochondrial respiration in HER2-positive SK-BR-3 cells: mechanism revealed by analysis of proteomic but not transcriptomic data.

Kamashev D, Shaban N, Zakharova G, Modestov A, Kamynina M, Baranov S Front Mol Biosci. 2024; 11:1470496.

PMID: 39403185 PMC: 11472020. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2024.1470496.


Targeting HER2 genomic alterations in non-small cell lung cancer.

Zeng J, Ma W, Young R, Li T J Natl Cancer Cent. 2024; 1(2):58-73.

PMID: 39035769 PMC: 11256690. DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2021.04.001.


ERBB2 mutations define a subgroup of endometrial carcinomas associated with high tumor mutational burden and the microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) molecular subtype.

Brodeur M, Selenica P, Ma W, Moufarrij S, Dagher C, Basili T Mol Oncol. 2024; 18(10):2356-2368.

PMID: 39031567 PMC: 11459037. DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13698.


Dynamic changes in tumor profiling reveal intra- and inter-tumoral heterogeneity focused on an uncharacterized HER2 mutation: a case report of a young breast cancer patient.

Schaffrin-Nabe D, Josten-Nabe A, Tannapfel A, Uhl W, Garmer M, Kurzrock R Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1395618.

PMID: 38764581 PMC: 11099277. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1395618.


References
1.
Fleishman S, Schlessinger J, Ben-Tal N . A putative molecular-activation switch in the transmembrane domain of erbB2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99(25):15937-40. PMC: 138543. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.252640799. View

2.
Desbois-Mouthon C . The HER3/ErbB3 receptor: a promising target in cancer drug therapy. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2010; 34(4-5):255-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.gcb.2010.03.002. View

3.
Nagano M, Kohsaka S, Ueno T, Kojima S, Saka K, Iwase H . High-Throughput Functional Evaluation of Variants of Unknown Significance in . Clin Cancer Res. 2018; 24(20):5112-5122. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0991. View

4.
Monteiro I, Madureira P, de Vasconscelos A, Pozza D, de Mello R . Targeting HER family in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: potential biomarkers and novel targeted therapies. Pharmacogenomics. 2015; 16(3):257-71. DOI: 10.2217/pgs.14.133. View

5.
Lima Z, Ghadamzadeh M, Tahmasebi Arashloo F, Amjad G, Ebadi M, Younesi L . Recent advances of therapeutic targets based on the molecular signature in breast cancer: genetic mutations and implications for current treatment paradigms. J Hematol Oncol. 2019; 12(1):38. PMC: 6460547. DOI: 10.1186/s13045-019-0725-6. View