» Articles » PMID: 32256341

Crossmodal Congruency Enhances Performance of Healthy Older Adults in Visual-Tactile Pattern Matching

Overview
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2020 Apr 8
PMID 32256341
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

One of the pivotal challenges of aging is to maintain independence in the activities of daily life. In order to adapt to changes in the environment, it is crucial to continuously process and accurately combine simultaneous input from different sensory systems, i.e., crossmodal or multisensory integration. With aging, performance decreases in multiple domains, affecting bottom-up sensory processing as well as top-down control. However, whether this decline leads to impairments in crossmodal interactions remains an unresolved question. While some researchers propose that crossmodal interactions degrade with age, others suggest that they are conserved or even gain compensatory importance. To address this question, we compared the behavioral performance of older and young participants in a well-established crossmodal matching task, requiring the evaluation of congruency in simultaneously presented visual and tactile patterns. Older participants performed significantly worse than young controls in the crossmodal task when being stimulated at their individual unimodal visual and tactile perception thresholds. Performance increased with adjustment of stimulus intensities. This improvement was driven by better detection of congruent stimulus pairs, while the detection of incongruent pairs was not significantly enhanced. These results indicate that age-related impairments lead to poor performance in complex crossmodal scenarios and demanding cognitive tasks. Crossmodal congruency effects attenuate the difficulties of older adults in visuotactile pattern matching and might be an important factor to drive the benefits of older adults demonstrated in various crossmodal integration scenarios. Congruency effects might, therefore, be used to develop strategies for cognitive training and neurological rehabilitation.

Citing Articles

[Interpretation of a concept for functional movement disorders from the perspective of older patients].

Maetzler W, Geritz J, Stagneth L, Emmert K Nervenarzt. 2024; 95(6):516-524.

PMID: 38361113 DOI: 10.1007/s00115-024-01614-8.


Age-Related Changes to Multisensory Integration and Audiovisual Speech Perception.

Pepper J, Nuttall H Brain Sci. 2023; 13(8).

PMID: 37626483 PMC: 10452685. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13081126.


Stimulation enhancement effect of the combination of exoskeleton-assisted hand rehabilitation and fingertip haptic stimulation.

Li M, Chen J, He B, He G, Zhao C, Yuan H Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:1149265.

PMID: 37287795 PMC: 10242052. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1149265.


The telehealth program of occupational therapy among older people: an up-to-date scoping review.

Ding J, Yang Y, Wu X, Xiao B, Ma L, Xu Y Aging Clin Exp Res. 2022; 35(1):23-40.

PMID: 36344805 PMC: 9640899. DOI: 10.1007/s40520-022-02291-w.


Sensory Dysfunction in Old Age.

Volter C, Thomas J, Maetzler W, Guthoff R, Grunwald M, Hummel T Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021; 118(29-30):512-520.

PMID: 34158149 PMC: 8476826. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0212.


References
1.
Folstein M, Folstein S, McHugh P . "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975; 12(3):189-98. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. View

2.
Diederich A, Colonius H, Schomburg A . Assessing age-related multisensory enhancement with the time-window-of-integration model. Neuropsychologia. 2008; 46(10):2556-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.03.026. View

3.
Peiffer A, Mozolic J, Hugenschmidt C, Laurienti P . Age-related multisensory enhancement in a simple audiovisual detection task. Neuroreport. 2007; 18(10):1077-81. DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3281e72ae7. View

4.
Guerreiro M, Anguera J, Mishra J, Van Gerven P, Gazzaley A . Age-equivalent top-down modulation during cross-modal selective attention. J Cogn Neurosci. 2014; 26(12):2827-39. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00685. View

5.
Brunetti R, Indraccolo A, Del Gatto C, Spence C, Santangelo V . Are crossmodal correspondences relative or absolute? Sequential effects on speeded classification. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017; 80(2):527-534. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-017-1445-z. View