» Articles » PMID: 32252708

The Effect of the Necrotic Area on the Biomechanics of the Femoral Head - a Finite Element Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2020 Apr 8
PMID 32252708
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Femoral head collapse is the key to the progress of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), but the causes of collapse are not completely clear. The better understanding of the progress of femoral head collapse will guide the treatment strategy for ONFH patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical influence of necrosis area on the collapse of the femoral head by finite element analysis.

Methods: CT and MRI data from the hip joint of a healthy volunteer were collected to establish a finite element (FE) model of a normal hip. Subsequently, five categories of osteonecrosis FE models were established by using the normal model and computer software according to China-Japan Friendship Hospital (CJFH) classification for ONFH. The CJFH system includes five types based on the size and location of necrosis lesions in the femoral head (type M, C, L1, L2, and L3) and the stage of ONFH. The collapse indices of each model were analyzed by FE method, including the displacement, peak von Mises stress and stress index of the simulated necrotic area as well as the lateral pillar contact area of the femoral head to acetabular.

Results: (1) The displacement increments in the simulated necrotic areas of type M, C, L1, L2, and L3 models were 3.75 μm, 8.24 μm, 8.47 μm, 18.42 μm, and 20.44 μm respectively; the peak von Mises stress decrements were 1.50 MPa, 3.74 MPa, 3.73 MPa, 4.91 MPa, and 4.92 MPa respectively; and the stress indices were 0.04, 0.08, 0.08, 0.27, and 0.27 respectively. (2) The displacement increments in the lateral pillar contact areas of five type models were significantly different (P < 0.001) and increased in sequence as follows: 1.93 ± 0.15 μm, 5.74 ± 0.92 μm, 5.84 ± 1.42 μm, 14.50 ± 3.00 μm, and 16.43 ± 3.05 μm. The peak von Mises stress decrements were also significantly different (P < 0.001) and increased in sequence as follows: 0.52 ± 0.30 MPa, 0.55 ± 0.12 MPa, 0.67 ± 0.33 MPa, 4.17 ± 0.59 MPa, and 4.19 ± 0.60 MPa. (3) The collapse indices including the displacement increments and peak von Mises stress decrements of type L2 and L3 models were markedly higher than those of type M, C, and L1 models (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The collapse indices of the femoral heads of type L2 and L3 FE models were significantly higher than those of type M, C, and L1. Different areas of necrosis result in varied impact on the femoral head collapse.

Citing Articles

A nomogram for predicting contralateral femoral head collapse after unilateral replacement of bilateral femoral head necrosis.

Zhu J, Sun X, Zhang L, Wang H, Tang P Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):5983.

PMID: 39966420 PMC: 11836322. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-88057-6.


Location or size? A finite element analysis study of necrotic lesion impact on femoral head collapse.

Lu S, Lin T, Han L, Li Z, He M, Wei Q J Orthop Surg Res. 2025; 20(1):48.

PMID: 39815308 PMC: 11734371. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-05453-4.


Biomechanical changes in the lumbar and hip joint after curved periacetabular osteotomy.

Qu Y, Tang H, Lu N, Li W, Xu P, Zhou T J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):770.

PMID: 39563445 PMC: 11575045. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05250-5.


A delphi-based model for prognosis of femoral head collapse in osteonecrosis: a multi-factorial approach.

Yang T, Sun S, Zhang L, Zhang X, He H J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):762.

PMID: 39548575 PMC: 11568688. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05247-0.


Computer-aided diagnosis for China-Japan Friendship Hospital classification of necrotic femurs using statistical shape and appearance model based on CT scans.

Zhang J, Gong H, Ren P, Liu S, Jia Z, Shi P Med Biol Eng Comput. 2024; 63(3):867-883.

PMID: 39538108 DOI: 10.1007/s11517-024-03239-0.


References
1.
Ueo T, Tsutsumi S, Yamamuro T, Okumura H, Shimizu A, Nakamura T . Biomechanical aspects of the development of aseptic necrosis of the femoral head. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (1978). 1985; 104(3):145-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF00454690. View

2.
Huang L, Chen F, Wang S, Wei Y, Huang G, Chen J . Three-dimensional finite element analysis of silk protein rod implantation after core decompression for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019; 20(1):544. PMC: 6858686. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2914-4. View

3.
Cao L, Guo C, Chen J, Chen Z, Yan Z . Free Vascularized Fibular Grafting Improves Vascularity Compared With Core Decompression in Femoral Head Osteonecrosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017; 475(9):2230-2240. PMC: 5539029. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-017-5374-x. View

4.
Brown T, Mutschler T, FERGUSON Jr A . A non-linear finite element analysis of some early collapse processes in femoral head osteonecrosis. J Biomech. 1982; 15(9):705-15. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(82)90024-0. View

5.
Nishii T, Sugano N, Ohzono K, Sakai T, Haraguchi K, Yoshikawa H . Progression and cessation of collapse in osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; (400):149-57. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200207000-00019. View