» Articles » PMID: 32250556

Mesh Versus Suture in Elective Repair of Umbilical Hernia: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal BJS Open
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2020 Apr 7
PMID 32250556
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Mesh repair of umbilical hernia has been associated with a reduced recurrence rate compared with suture closure, but potentially at the expense of increased postoperative complications and chronic pain. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the outcomes after elective open mesh and suture repair for umbilical hernia in adults.

Methods: A literature search was conducted to identify studies presenting original data on elective open mesh and suture repair of umbilical hernia. The primary outcome was hernia recurrence. Secondary outcomes included surgical-site infection (SSI), seroma, haematoma and chronic pain. Meta-analyses were undertaken.

Results: The search resulted in 5353 hits and led to 14 studies being included (6 RCTs and 8 observational studies) describing a total of 2361 patients. Compared with suture, mesh repair was associated with a lower risk of recurrence (risk ratio (RR) 0·48, 95 per cent c.i. 0·30 to 0·77), with number needed to treat 19 (95 per cent c.i. 14 to 31). Mesh repair was associated with a higher risk of seroma (RR 2·37, 1·45 to 3·87), with number needed to harm 30 (17 to 86). There was no significant difference in the risk of SSI, haematoma or chronic pain.

Conclusion: The use of mesh in elective repair of umbilical hernia reduced the risk of recurrence compared with suture closure without altering the risk of chronic pain.

Citing Articles

Onlay mesh versus suture repair for smaller umbilical hernias in adults-early results from SUMMER trial: randomized clinical trial.

Bergstrom M, Widhe B, Granasen G, Lof Granstrom A, Ohlsson J, Schult S BJS Open. 2025; 9(1).

PMID: 40037347 PMC: 11879325. DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae173.


Surgical practices in emergency umbilical hernia repair and implications for trial design.

Walshaw J, Smart N, Blencowe N, Lee M Hernia. 2024; 28(6):2333-2341.

PMID: 39305352 PMC: 11530507. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03165-y.


Mesh versus suture for elective primary umbilical hernia open repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dias Rasador A, da Silveira C, Lima D, Nogueira R, Malcher F, Sreeramoju P Hernia. 2024; 28(6):2069-2078.

PMID: 39001938 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-03106-9.


The role of computed tomography in acute bowel obstruction due to a supravesical hernia: a case report from Nepal.

Panthi A, Thapaliya I, Khadka L, Bhusal M, Dev S, Jha S Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024; 86(7):4268-4273.

PMID: 38989232 PMC: 11230816. DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002222.


Repair of umbilical hernias concomitant to other procedures is safe: a propensity score-matched database study.

Hegstad B, Jensen T, Helgstrand F, Henriksen N Hernia. 2024; 28(4):1093-1101.

PMID: 38488931 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-02977-2.


References
1.
Polat C, Dervisoglu A, Senyurek G, Bilgin M, Erzurumlu K, Ozkan K . Umbilical hernia repair with the prolene hernia system. Am J Surg. 2005; 190(1):61-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.09.021. View

2.
Tunio N . Hernioplasty: Tension free mesh repair versus Mayos repair for umbilical hernias. J Pak Med Assoc. 2017; 67(1):24-26. View

3.
Asolati M, Huerta S, Sarosi G, Harmon R, Bell C, Anthony T . Predictors of recurrence in veteran patients with umbilical hernia: single center experience. Am J Surg. 2006; 192(5):627-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.08.022. View

4.
Berger R, Li L, Hicks S, Liang M . Suture versus preperitoneal polypropylene mesh for elective umbilical hernia repairs. J Surg Res. 2014; 192(2):426-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.05.080. View

5.
Sanjay P, Reid T, Davies E, Arumugam P, Woodward A . Retrospective comparison of mesh and sutured repair for adult umbilical hernias. Hernia. 2005; 9(3):248-51. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-005-0342-x. View