» Articles » PMID: 32249394

Comparing Four Methods of Rearing Varroa Destructor in Vitro

Overview
Journal Exp Appl Acarol
Specialties Biology
Parasitology
Date 2020 Apr 7
PMID 32249394
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The parasitic mite Varroa destructor Anderson and Trueman continues to devastate western honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies throughout most of the world where they are managed. The development of a method to rear Varroa in vitro would allow for year-round Varroa research, rapidly advancing our progress towards controlling the mite. We created two separate experiments to address this objective. First, we determined which of four in vitro rearing methods yields the greatest number of Varroa offspring. Second, we attempted to improve the rearing rates achieved with that method. The four methods tested included (1) rearing Varroa on honey bee pupae in gelatin capsules, (2) rearing Varroa on in vitro-reared honey bees, (3) group rearing Varroa on honey bee pupae in Petri dishes, and (4) providing Varroa a bee-derived diet. The number of reproducing females and the number of fully mature offspring were significantly higher in the gelatin capsules maintained at 75% RH than in any other method. A 2 × 3 full factorial design was used to test combinations of gelatin capsule size (6 and 7 mm diameter) and relative humidity (65, 75, or 85%) on Varroa rearing success. Varroa reproduction and survival were significantly higher in 7-mm-diameter gelatin capsules maintained at 75% RH than in those maintained in 6-mm capsules and at the other humidities. By identifying factors that influence Varroa reproductive success in vitro, this work provides an important foundation for the development of future rearing protocols.

Citing Articles

Developing a method to rear Varroa destructor in vitro.

Johnson B, Prouty C, Jack C, Stuhl C, Ellis J Exp Appl Acarol. 2024; 92(4):795-808.

PMID: 38478141 DOI: 10.1007/s10493-024-00905-8.


The Effect of Comb Cell Size on the Development of Drones.

Zhang L, Shao L, Raza M, Han R, Li W Life (Basel). 2024; 14(2).

PMID: 38398731 PMC: 10890408. DOI: 10.3390/life14020222.


Life-history stage determines the diet of ectoparasitic mites on their honey bee hosts.

Han B, Wu J, Wei Q, Liu F, Cui L, Rueppell O Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):725.

PMID: 38272866 PMC: 10811344. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-44915-x.


Honey Bee Larval Hemolymph as a Source of Key Nutrients and Proteins Offers a Promising Medium for Artificial Rearing.

Piou V, Vilarem C, Blanchard S, Strub J, Bertile F, Bocquet M Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(15).

PMID: 37569818 PMC: 10419257. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241512443.


A gene drive does not spread easily in populations of the honey bee parasite .

Faber N, Meiborg A, Mcfarlane G, Gorjanc G, Harpur B Apidologie. 2022; 52(6):1112-1127.

PMID: 35068598 PMC: 8755698. DOI: 10.1007/s13592-021-00891-5.


References
1.
Ellis M, Nicolson S, Crewe R, Dietemann V . Hygropreference and brood care in the honeybee (Apis mellifera). J Insect Physiol. 2008; 54(12):1516-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2008.08.011. View

2.
Haussermann C, Ziegelmann B, Rosenkranz P . Spermatozoa capacitation in female Varroa destructor and its influence on the timing and success of female reproduction. Exp Appl Acarol. 2016; 69(4):371-87. DOI: 10.1007/s10493-016-0051-4. View

3.
Thompson C, Biesmeijer J, Allnutt T, Pietravalle S, Budge G . Parasite pressures on feral honey bees (Apis mellifera sp.). PLoS One. 2014; 9(8):e105164. PMC: 4134278. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105164. View

4.
Calderone N, Kuenen L . Effects of western honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) colony, cell type, and larval sex on host acquisition by female Varroa destructor (Acari: Varroidae). J Econ Entomol. 2001; 94(5):1022-30. DOI: 10.1603/0022-0493-94.5.1022. View

5.
Piou V, Tabart J, Urrutia V, Hemptinne J, Vetillard A . Impact of the Phoretic Phase on Reproduction and Damage Caused by Varroa destructor (Anderson and Trueman) to Its Host, the European Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.). PLoS One. 2016; 11(4):e0153482. PMC: 4838260. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153482. View