» Articles » PMID: 32244930

Inherent Bias in Artificial Intelligence-Based Decision Support Systems for Healthcare

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2020 Apr 5
PMID 32244930
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective of this article is to discuss the inherent bias involved with artificial intelligence-based decision support systems for healthcare. In this article, the authors describe some relevant work published in this area. A proposed overview of solutions is also presented. The authors believe that the information presented in this article will enhance the readers' understanding of this inherent bias and add to the discussion on this topic. Finally, the authors discuss an overview of the need to implement transdisciplinary solutions that can be used to mitigate this bias.

Citing Articles

Clinical Decision Support to Increase Emergency Department Naloxone Coprescribing: Implementation Report.

Sommers S, Tolle H, Trinkley K, Johnston C, Dietsche C, Eldred S JMIR Med Inform. 2024; 12:e58276.

PMID: 39504560 PMC: 11560079. DOI: 10.2196/58276.


Twelve tips for addressing ethical concerns in the implementation of artificial intelligence in medical education.

DSouza R, Mathew M, Mishra V, Surapaneni K Med Educ Online. 2024; 29(1):2330250.

PMID: 38566608 PMC: 10993743. DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2024.2330250.


Clinical decision support systems for diabetic foot ulcers: a scoping review.

Garces T, Leal de Araujo A, Sousa G, Cestari V, Florencio R, Mattos S Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2024; 57:e20230218.

PMID: 38362842 PMC: 10870364. DOI: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0218en.


Should Artificial Intelligence be used to support clinical ethical decision-making? A systematic review of reasons.

Benzinger L, Ursin F, Balke W, Kacprowski T, Salloch S BMC Med Ethics. 2023; 24(1):48.

PMID: 37415172 PMC: 10327319. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-023-00929-6.


Bias Analysis in Healthcare Time Series (BAHT) Decision Support Systems from Meta Data.

Dakshit S, Dakshit S, Khargonkar N, Prabhakaran B J Healthc Inform Res. 2023; 7(2):225-253.

PMID: 37377633 PMC: 10290973. DOI: 10.1007/s41666-023-00133-6.


References
1.
Bohannon J . Who's afraid of peer review?. Science. 2013; 342(6154):60-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.2013.342.6154.342_60. View

2.
Dressel J, Farid H . The accuracy, fairness, and limits of predicting recidivism. Sci Adv. 2018; 4(1):eaao5580. PMC: 5777393. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aao5580. View

3.
Althubaiti A . Information bias in health research: definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016; 9:211-7. PMC: 4862344. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S104807. View

4.
Henriksen K, Kaplan H . Hindsight bias, outcome knowledge and adaptive learning. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003; 12 Suppl 2:ii46-50. PMC: 1765779. DOI: 10.1136/qhc.12.suppl_2.ii46. View

5.
Fragale A, Heath C . Evolving informational credentials: the (mis)attribution of believable facts to credible sources. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004; 30(2):225-36. DOI: 10.1177/0146167203259933. View