» Articles » PMID: 32239481

Code Status Discussions in Medical Inpatients: Results of a Survey of Patients and Physicians

Overview
Journal Swiss Med Wkly
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2020 Apr 3
PMID 32239481
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Code status discussions are useful for understanding patients’ preferences in the case of a cardiac/pulmonary arrest. These discussions can also provide patients with a basis for informed decision-making regarding life-sustaining treatment. We conducted a survey to understand current practices and perceptions of code status discussions in a tertiary-care Swiss hospital.

Methods: We performed systematic interviews across different departments of the University Hospital of Basel. We interviewed 258 physicians and 145 patients who were hospitalised between May and July 2018 using a questionnaire designed to assess the use of code status discussions and to gauge patients’ individual experiences and opinions.

Results: A total of 61.4% of patients did not recall having had a code status discussion during the hospital stay. However, a higher proportion of medical patients compared to surgical patients recalled having had a discussion (43.6 vs 22.4%, p = 0.03). For 9 out of 38 (23.7%) patients who did recall the discussion, there was a lack of agreement between the preference given in the interview regarding resuscitation measures and the documented code status in the medical electronic chart. Furthermore, a majority of physicians (72.4%) recalled defining a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) status for a patient without prior discussion with the patient. Physicians who recalled determining the DNR status without patient consultation reported conflicts with patients and relatives regarding code status at a higher rate compared to physicians who did not define DNR status without consultation (62.4 vs 39.4%, p <0.001).

Conclusion: A majority of patients do not report having discussed code status during their hospital stay and physicians frequently omit such discussions, thereby potentially failing to attend to patients’ preferences for care. Physician training regarding code status discussions may improve the quality of informed decision-making and patient-centred care.

Citing Articles

The instrumental value of advance directives: lesson learned from the COVID-19 pandemic for policymaking.

Stock E, Nickel C, Elger B, Martani A Res Health Serv Reg. 2025; 4(1):1.

PMID: 39907962 PMC: 11799459. DOI: 10.1007/s43999-025-00060-6.


Increasing resuscitation status-related goals of care discussions for older adults with severe mental illness in a Canadian mental health setting: a retrospective study.

de Lasa C, Mesfin E, Tajirian T, Chessex C, Lo B, Sockalingam S BMJ Open Qual. 2024; 13(4).

PMID: 39532386 PMC: 11555105. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002798.


A survey study of healthcare workers on do not Attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation practice and policy in Ireland.

Lombard J, Davidson H, Doody O Resusc Plus. 2024; 20:100799.

PMID: 39469139 PMC: 11513516. DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100799.


Physicians' training and patient education initiative to improve quality of care decision communication at the emergency department.

Briede S, van Charldorp T, Peerden J, Kaasjager K BMJ Open Qual. 2024; 13(3).

PMID: 39327047 PMC: 11429346. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002829.


Comprehensive geriatric assessment as an essential tool to register or update DNR codes in a tertiary care hospital.

Mertens V, Cottignie C, van de Wiel M, Vandewoude M, Perkisas S, Roelant E Eur Geriatr Med. 2024; 15(2):295-303.

PMID: 38277096 DOI: 10.1007/s41999-023-00925-4.