» Articles » PMID: 32230962

Improving Emergency Department Efficiency by Patient Scheduling Using Deep Reinforcement Learning

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2020 Apr 2
PMID 32230962
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Emergency departments (ED) in hospitals usually suffer from crowdedness and long waiting times for treatment. The complexity of the patient's path flows and their controls come from the patient's diverse acute level, personalized treatment process, and interconnected medical staff and resources. One of the factors, which has been controlled, is the dynamic situation change such as the patient's composition and resources' availability. The patient's scheduling is thus complicated in consideration of various factors to achieve ED efficiency. To address this issue, a deep reinforcement learning (RL) is designed and applied in an ED patients' scheduling process. Before applying the deep RL, the mathematical model and the Markov decision process (MDP) for the ED is presented and formulated. Then, the algorithm of the RL based on deep Q-networks (DQN) is designed to determine the optimal policy for scheduling patients. To evaluate the performance of the deep RL, it is compared with the dispatching rules presented in the study. The deep RL is shown to outperform the dispatching rules in terms of minimizing the weighted waiting time of the patients and the penalty of emergent patients in the suggested scenarios. This study demonstrates the successful implementation of the deep RL for ED applications, particularly in assisting decision-makers under the dynamic environment of an ED.

Citing Articles

Principles of artificial intelligence in radiooncology.

Huang Y, Gomaa A, Hofler D, Schubert P, Gaipl U, Frey B Strahlenther Onkol. 2024; 201(3):210-235.

PMID: 39105746 PMC: 11839771. DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02272-0.


Introduction to supervised machine learning in clinical epidemiology.

Ono S, Goto T Ann Clin Epidemiol. 2024; 4(3):63-71.

PMID: 38504945 PMC: 10760492. DOI: 10.37737/ace.22009.


Applying Simulation Optimization to Minimize Drug Inventory Costs: A Study of a Case Outpatient Pharmacy.

Chen C, Lai C, Lu G, Huang C, Wu L, Lin H Healthcare (Basel). 2022; 10(3).

PMID: 35327033 PMC: 8954113. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10030556.


Artificial intelligence and machine learning in emergency medicine: a narrative review.

Mueller B, Kinoshita T, Peebles A, Graber M, Lee S Acute Med Surg. 2022; 9(1):e740.

PMID: 35251669 PMC: 8887797. DOI: 10.1002/ams2.740.


Using Simulation Optimization to Solve Patient Appointment Scheduling and Examination Room Assignment Problems for Patients Undergoing Ultrasound Examination.

Chen P, Chen G, Liu L, Zheng C, Huang W Healthcare (Basel). 2022; 10(1).

PMID: 35052327 PMC: 8775607. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10010164.


References
1.
Rismanchian F, Lee Y . Process Mining-Based Method of Designing and Optimizing the Layouts of Emergency Departments in Hospitals. HERD. 2017; 10(4):105-120. DOI: 10.1177/1937586716674471. View

2.
Murray M . The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale: A Canadian perspective on emergency department triage. Emerg Med (Fremantle). 2003; 15(1):6-10. DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-2026.2003.00400.x. View

3.
Savage D, Woolford D, Weaver B, Wood D . Developing emergency department physician shift schedules optimized to meet patient demand. CJEM. 2015; 17(1):3-12. DOI: 10.2310/8000.2013.131224. View

4.
Azadeh A, Hosseinabadi Farahani M, Torabzadeh S, Baghersad M . Scheduling prioritized patients in emergency department laboratories. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2014; 117(2):61-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2014.08.006. View

5.
Considine J, LeVasseur S, Villanueva E . The Australasian Triage Scale: examining emergency department nurses' performance using computer and paper scenarios. Ann Emerg Med. 2004; 44(5):516-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.04.007. View