» Articles » PMID: 32229250

An Embedded Mixed-methods Study Highlighted a Lack of Discussions on Retention in Clinical Trial Consultations

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Public Health
Date 2020 Apr 2
PMID 32229250
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: This study investigated trial consultations to identify whether and to what extent discussions of retention are present.

Study Design And Setting: This embedded mixed-methods study design included a purposive sample of audio-recorded trial consultations obtained from four sites of a large multicenter UK-based surgical RCT. Study participants included potential trial participants, trial surgeons (TSs), and research nurses (RNs).

Results: Forty-four participants were included in this study: potential trial participants (n = 37); TSs (n = 4); and RNs (n = 3). Analysis revealed no discussion of retention across 79% of consultations. Of the remaining 21% where discussions of retention were present, only 3% (maximum) of the conversation related to retention. There was some evidence of good practice, but on the whole the discussions contained inaccuracies about timing and delivery of questionnaires and the right to withdraw often highlighted without providing trial consequences.

Conclusion: This study is the first to explore trial consultations for discussions of retention. It suggests that there may be room for improvement within current practice. Further research is required to determine the generalizability of the findings reported to other clinical trials.

Citing Articles

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conservative management for adults with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones: the C-GALL RCT.

Innes K, Ahmed I, Hudson J, Hernandez R, Gillies K, Bruce R Health Technol Assess. 2024; 28(26):1-151.

PMID: 38943314 PMC: 11228691. DOI: 10.3310/MNBY3104.


Retention strategies are routinely communicated to potential trial participants but often differ from what was planned in the trial protocol: an analysis of adult participant information leaflets and their corresponding protocols.

Murphy E, Gillies K, Shiely F Trials. 2024; 25(1):372.

PMID: 38858790 PMC: 11163762. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08194-7.


How can we support research participants who stop taking part? Communications guidance developed through public-researcher collaboration.

Cragg W, Bishop L, Gilberts R, Gregg M, Lowdon T, Mancini M Res Involv Engagem. 2024; 10(1):39.

PMID: 38637845 PMC: 11025252. DOI: 10.1186/s40900-024-00572-4.


The overlap between randomised evaluations of recruitment and retention interventions: An updated review of recruitment (Online Resource for Recruitment in Clinical triAls) and retention (Online Resource for Retention in Clinical triAls) literature.

Kearney A, Butlin L, Coffey T, Conway T, Cotterill S, Evans A Clin Trials. 2024; 21(5):640-649.

PMID: 38576071 PMC: 11528860. DOI: 10.1177/17407745241238444.


How do trial teams plan for retention during the design stage of the trial? A scoping review.

Murphy E, Gillies K, Shiely F Trials. 2023; 24(1):784.

PMID: 38049833 PMC: 10694955. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07775-2.