» Articles » PMID: 32218193

In Vitro Methods of Assessing Protein Quality for Poultry

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2020 Mar 29
PMID 32218193
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Protein quality assessment of feed ingredients for poultry is often achieved using in vitro or in vivo testing. In vivo methods can be expensive and time consuming. Protein quality can also be evaluated using less expensive and time consuming chemical methods, termed in vitro. These techniques are used to improve the user's efficiency when dealing with large sample numbers, and some mimic the physiological and chemical characteristics of the animal digestive system to which the ingredient will be fed. The pepsin digestibility test is the in vitro method of choice for quick evaluation of protein sample during quality control and in most research settings. Even though the pepsin digestibility test uses enzymes to liberate the amino acids from the protein, it does not mimic normal in vivo digestive conditions. The results obtained with this method may be misleading if the samples tested contain fats or carbohydrates which they often do. Multi-enzyme tests have been proposed to overcome the problem encountered when using the pepsin digestibility test. These tests use a combination of enzymes in one or multiple steps customized to simulate the digestive process of the animal. Multi enzyme assays can predict animal digestibility, but any inherent biological properties of the ingredients on the animal digestive tract will be lost.

Citing Articles

Optimizing the zymogram of exogenous proteases in broiler diets by in vitro simulated gastrointestinal digestion and response surface methodology.

Liu Y, Liu S, Chen F, Liu S, Lin Q, Dai Q Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):6605.

PMID: 39994257 PMC: 11850901. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-88954-w.


Physicochemical and techno-functional characterization of soluble proteins extracted by ultrasound from the cricket .

Cruz-Lopez S, Escalona-Buendia H, Martinez-Arellano I, Dominguez-Soberanes J, Alvarez-Cisneros Y Heliyon. 2024; 10(23):e40718.

PMID: 39717599 PMC: 11665385. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40718.


The Bioavailability of Solid-State Fermented Feather Meal Using a Novel Feather-Degrading Bacterium PN1 in Broilers.

Kuo T, Wei H Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(22).

PMID: 39595307 PMC: 11591189. DOI: 10.3390/ani14223254.


Prediction of apparent total tract digestion of crude protein in adult dogs.

Seo K, Cho H, Lee M, Kim C, Kim K, Chun J J Anim Sci Technol. 2024; 66(2):374-386.

PMID: 38628688 PMC: 11016737. DOI: 10.5187/jast.2024.e20.


Multiprotease improves amino acid release in vitro, energy, and nutrient utilization in broilers fed diets varying in crude protein levels.

Penuela-Sierra L, Aragao-Neto V, Lozano-Cruz P, Mejia-Abaunza J, Ali M, Cabanas-Ojeda J Poult Sci. 2024; 103(5):103546.

PMID: 38430776 PMC: 10912919. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.103546.


References
1.
Perez-Calvo E, Castrillo C, Baucells M, Guada J . Effect of rendering on protein and fat quality of animal by-products. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2010; 94(5):e154-63. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2010.00998.x. View

2.
Doiron K, Yu P, McKinnon J, Christensen D . Heat-induced protein structure and subfractions in relation to protein degradation kinetics and intestinal availability in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2009; 92(7):3319-30. PMC: 5503212. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2008-1946. View

3.
Mangan J . Nutritional effects of tannins in animal feeds. Nutr Res Rev. 2008; 1(1):209-31. DOI: 10.1079/NRR19880015. View

4.
Selle P, Ravindran V, Caldwell A, Bryden W . Phytate and phytase: consequences for protein utilisation. Nutr Res Rev. 2008; 13(2):255-78. DOI: 10.1079/095442200108729098. View

5.
LYMAN C, Chang W, Couch J . Evaluation of protein quality in cottonseed meals by chick growth and by a chemical index method. J Nutr. 1953; 49(4):679-90. DOI: 10.1093/jn/49.4.679. View