Incidence and Anatomical Properties of Retromolar Canal in an Iranian Population: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study

Overview

Journal Int J Dent

Publisher Wiley

Specialty Dentistry

Date 2020 Mar 27

PMID 32211048

Citations 7

Authors

N Nikkerdar

A Golshah

M Norouzi

S Falah-Kooshki

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: Retromolar canal (RC) is an anatomic structure, and due to increasing demand for surgical procedure in the retromolar area of the mandible, the identification of the retromolar canal has become an issue of clinical concern. It can innervate the third molar and some of the muscles around the posterior segment of the mandible, complicating surgical procedures in the retromolar area and root canal treatment of third molars. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and anatomical properties of RC in a western Iranian population using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. . Two hundred bilateral CBCT images were collected and screened in the three spatial planes for the presence of an RC. Anatomical properties and location of the RCs were assessed according to their course and distance from the surrounding structures. The relationship between the presence of RC and age, sex, side, and presence of second and third molars was also evaluated. Independent samples -test, ANOVA, Tukey's post hoc test, paired -test, ANOVA, Tukey's post hoc test, paired.

Results: At least one RC was observed in 22% of the mandibles. Its bilateral incidence was 5.5%. Two major types of canals were detected, namely, type I, following a straight or curved course from the mandibular canal (MC) to the retromolar area (47.3%), and type II, coursing from the retromolar area to the radicular part of the third molar (52.7%). Regarding linear measurements, the mean RC diameter and the mean distance to the MC, second, and third molars were 0.68 ± 0.31, 13.7 ± 2.8, 15.3 ± 3.0, and 7.3 ± 2.3 mm, respectively.

Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, RC was found in 22% of the cases; thus, it should be considered as a normal anatomical variation in the Iranian population rather than a rare finding.

Citing Articles

Morphometric Analysis of the Mandibular Canal and Its Anatomical Variants in a Chilean Subpopulation: Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.

Guzman J, Abarca J, Navarro P, Garay I, Arnabat-Dominguez J, Betancourt P Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(17).

PMID: 39272699 PMC: 11394078. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14171914.

A Morphometric Study of the Retromolar Fossa and the Incidence of the Retromolar Foramen in Dry Human Mandibles.

Dwivedi D, Saba N, Shakya P, Singh H, Chauhan N Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e66050.

PMID: 39224742 PMC: 11367063. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.66050.

Anatomical Patterns of the Nasopalatine Canal and Incisive Foramen in an African Setting: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Sarna K, Estreed M, Sonigra K, Amuti T, Opondo F, Kamau M Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2023; 16(3):222-233.

PMID: 37975024 PMC: 10638970. DOI: 10.1177/19433875221100943.

Prevalence of retromolar foramen in nineteenth century Spanish population.

Carneiro M, Rubira C, Martinez-Sanz E, Arraez-Aybar L, Murillo-Gonzalez J Odontology. 2022; 111(3):734-741.

PMID: 36525151 DOI: 10.1007/s10266-022-00779-5.

Inter-observer reliability in cone-beam computed tomography assessment of the retromolar canal: A practical plan to improve diagnostic imaging.

Igarashi C, Theramballi Y, Kobayashi K Imaging Sci Dent. 2022; 52(2):181-186.

PMID: 35799969 PMC: 9226238. DOI: 10.5624/isd.20210289.

References

Bilecenoglu B, Tuncer N . Clinical and anatomical study of retromolar foramen and canal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006; 64(10):1493-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.05.043. View

Sisman Y, Ercan-Sekerci A, Payveren-Arikan M, Sahman H . Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam CT compared with panoramic images in predicting retromolar canal during extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014; 20(1):e74-81. PMC: 4320425. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.19930. View

Kikuta S, Iwanaga J, Nakamura K, Hino K, Nakamura M, Kusukawa J . The retromolar canals and foramina: radiographic observation and application to oral surgery. Surg Radiol Anat. 2018; 40(6):647-652. DOI: 10.1007/s00276-018-2005-5. View

Jablonski N, Cheng C, Cheng L, Cheung H . Unusual origins of the buccal and mylohyoid nerves. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1985; 60(5):487-8. DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(85)90235-x. View

SCHEJTMAN R, Devoto F, ARIAS N . The origin and distribution of the elements of the human mandibular retromolar canal. Arch Oral Biol. 1967; 12(11):1261-8. DOI: 10.1016/0003-9969(67)90127-6. View

Motamedi M, Gharedaghi J, Mehralizadeh S, Navi F, Badkoobeh A, Valaei N . Anthropomorphic assessment of the retromolar foramen and retromolar nerve: anomaly or variation of normal anatomy?. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015; 45(2):241-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.10.017. View

Ossenberg N . Retromolar foramen of the human mandible. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1987; 73(1):119-28. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330730112. View

Potu B, Kumar V, Salem A, Abu-Hijleh M . Occurrence of the retromolar foramen in dry mandibles of South-eastern part of India: a morphological study with review of the literature. Anat Res Int. 2014; 2014:296717. PMC: 4197892. DOI: 10.1155/2014/296717. View

Naitoh M, Hiraiwa Y, Aimiya H, Ariji E . Observation of bifid mandibular canal using cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24(1):155-9. View

10.

Nortje C, Farman A, GROTEPASS F . Variations in the normal anatomy of the inferior dental (mandibular) canal: a retrospective study of panoramic radiographs from 3612 routine dental patients. Br J Oral Surg. 1977; 15(1):55-63. DOI: 10.1016/0007-117x(77)90008-7. View

11.

Mansilla Lory J, Pompa J, Kjaer I . The human mandibular canal arises from three separate canals innervating different tooth groups. J Dent Res. 1996; 75(8):1540-4. DOI: 10.1177/00220345960750080401. View

12.

Carter R, KEEN E . The intramandibular course of the inferior alveolar nerve. J Anat. 1971; 108(Pt 3):433-40. PMC: 1234179. View

13.

Ossenberg N . Temporal crest canal: case report and statistics on a rare mandibular variant. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1986; 62(1):10-2. DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(86)90062-9. View

14.

Lizio G, Pelliccioni G, Ghigi G, Fanelli A, Marchetti C . Radiographic assessment of the mandibular retromolar canal using cone-beam computed tomography. Acta Odontol Scand. 2012; 71(3-4):650-5. DOI: 10.3109/00016357.2012.704393. View

15.

Han S, Hwang Y . Cone beam CT findings of retromolar canals in a Korean population. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014; 36(9):871-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00276-014-1262-1. View

16.

Capote T, Goncalves M, Campos J . Retromolar Canal Associated with Age, Side, Sex, Bifid Mandibular Canal, and Accessory Mental Foramen in Panoramic Radiographs of Brazilians. Anat Res Int. 2015; 2015:434083. PMC: 4558431. DOI: 10.1155/2015/434083. View

17.

Muinelo-Lorenzo J, Suarez-Quintanilla J, Fernandez-Alonso A, Marsillas-Rascado S, Suarez-Cunqueiro M . Descriptive study of the bifid mandibular canals and retromolar foramina: cone beam CT vs panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014; 43(5):20140090. PMC: 4082272. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20140090. View

18.

Park M, Jung W, Bae J, Kwak H . Anatomical and radiographic study of the mandibular retromolar canal. J Dent Sci. 2019; 11(4):370-376. PMC: 6395182. DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2016.04.002. View

19.

Zhang Y, Zhao Y, Liu D, Meng Y, Ma X . Bifid variations of the mandibular canal: cone beam computed tomography evaluation of 1000 Northern Chinese patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018; 126(5):e271-e278. DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2018.06.008. View

20.

Okumus O, Dumlu A . Prevalence of bifid mandibular canal according to gender, type and side. J Dent Sci. 2019; 14(2):126-133. PMC: 6562102. DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2019.03.009. View