» Articles » PMID: 32204632

Development and Characterization of a Tissue Mimicking Psyllium Husk Gelatin Phantom for Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Overview
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Specialties Oncology
Pharmacology
Date 2020 Mar 25
PMID 32204632
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To develop and characterize a tissue-mimicking phantom that enables the direct comparison of magnetic resonance (MR) and ultrasound (US) imaging techniques useful for monitoring high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatments. With no additions, gelatin phantoms produce little if any scattering required for US imaging. This study characterizes the MR and US image characteristics as a function of psyllium husk concentration, which was added to increase US scattering. Gelatin phantoms were constructed with varying concentrations of psyllium husk. The effects of psyllium husk concentration on US B-mode and MR imaging were evaluated at nine different concentrations. T1, T2, and T2* MR maps were acquired. Acoustic properties (attenuation and speed of sound) were measured at frequencies of 0.6, 1.0, 1.8, and 3.0 MHz using a through-transmission technique. Phantom elastic properties were evaluated for both time and temperature dependence. Ultrasound image echogenicity increased with increasing psyllium husk concentration while quality of gradient-recalled echo MR images decreased with increasing concentration. For all phantoms, the measured speed of sound ranged between 1567-1569 m/s and the attenuation ranged between 0.42-0.44 dB/(cm·MHz). Measured T1 ranged from 974-1051 ms. The T2 and T2* values ranged from 97-108 ms and 48-88 ms, respectively, with both showing a decreasing trend with increased psyllium husk concentration. Phantom stiffness, measured using US shear-wave speed measurements, increased with age and decreased with increasing temperature. The presented dual-use tissue-mimicking phantom is easy to manufacture and can be used to compare and evaluate US-guided and MR-guided HIFU imaging protocols.

Citing Articles

Systematic Review of 3D-Printed Ultrasound-able Models in Graduate Medical Education.

Krech J, Wyatt T, Harmon D J Ultrasound Med. 2024; 44(4):595-603.

PMID: 39624847 PMC: 11892083. DOI: 10.1002/jum.16624.


Estimation of the Proton Resonance Frequency Coefficient in Agar-based Phantoms.

Filippou A, Evripidou N, Georgiou A, Nikolaou A, Damianou C J Med Phys. 2024; 49(2):167-180.

PMID: 39131424 PMC: 11309147. DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_146_23.


A Dynamic Ultrasound Phantom with Tissue-Mimicking Mechanical and Acoustic Properties.

Fernandez S, Kim J, Sadat D, Marcus C, Suh E, Mclntosh R Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024; 11(22):e2400271.

PMID: 38647427 PMC: 11165531. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202400271.


High-resolution acoustic mapping of tunable gelatin-based phantoms for ultrasound tissue characterization.

Badawe H, Raad P, Khraiche M Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1276143.

PMID: 38456002 PMC: 10917893. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1276143.


Perfluorocarbon emulsion enhances MR-ARFI displacement and temperature : Evaluating the response with MRI, NMR, and hydrophone.

Holman R, Lorton O, Guillemin P, Desgranges S, Santini F, Preso D Front Oncol. 2023; 12:1025481.

PMID: 36713528 PMC: 9880467. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1025481.


References
1.
Farrer A, Odeen H, de Bever J, Coats B, Parker D, Payne A . Characterization and evaluation of tissue-mimicking gelatin phantoms for use with MRgFUS. J Ther Ultrasound. 2015; 3:9. PMC: 4490606. DOI: 10.1186/s40349-015-0030-y. View

2.
Ghanouni P, Dobrotwir A, Bazzocchi A, Bucknor M, Bitton R, Rosenberg J . Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound treatment of extra-abdominal desmoid tumors: a retrospective multicenter study. Eur Radiol. 2016; 27(2):732-740. PMC: 5097700. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4376-5. View

3.
McDannold N, Maier S . Magnetic resonance acoustic radiation force imaging. Med Phys. 2008; 35(8):3748-58. PMC: 2673647. DOI: 10.1118/1.2956712. View

4.
Sapareto S, Dewey W . Thermal dose determination in cancer therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1984; 10(6):787-800. DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(84)90379-1. View

5.
Vaezy S, Shi X, Martin R, Chi E, Nelson P, Bailey M . Real-time visualization of high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment using ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2001; 27(1):33-42. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(00)00279-9. View