» Articles » PMID: 32204411

The Impact of COVID-19 Epidemic Declaration on Psychological Consequences: A Study on Active Weibo Users

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 Mar 25
PMID 32204411
Citations 637
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

COVID-19 (Corona Virus Disease 2019) has significantly resulted in a large number of psychological consequences. The aim of this study is to explore the impacts of COVID-19 on people's mental health, to assist policy makers to develop actionable policies, and help clinical practitioners (e.g., social workers, psychiatrists, and psychologists) provide timely services to affected populations. We sample and analyze the Weibo posts from 17,865 active Weibo users using the approach of Online Ecological Recognition (OER) based on several machine-learning predictive models. We calculated word frequency, scores of emotional indicators (e.g., anxiety, depression, indignation, and Oxford happiness) and cognitive indicators (e.g., social risk judgment and life satisfaction) from the collected data. The sentiment analysis and the paired sample t-test were performed to examine the differences in the same group before and after the declaration of COVID-19 on 20 January, 2020. The results showed that negative emotions (e.g., anxiety, depression and indignation) and sensitivity to social risks increased, while the scores of positive emotions (e.g., Oxford happiness) and life satisfaction decreased. People were concerned more about their health and family, while less about leisure and friends. The results contribute to the knowledge gaps of short-term individual changes in psychological conditions after the outbreak. It may provide references for policy makers to plan and fight against COVID-19 effectively by improving stability of popular feelings and urgently prepare clinical practitioners to deliver corresponding therapy foundations for the risk groups and affected people.

Citing Articles

Understanding Loneliness in Older Adults During the Pandemic: Predictors and Questionnaire Validation.

Orlandini R, Lusic Kalcina L, Anticevic V Diseases. 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 39997052 PMC: 11853930. DOI: 10.3390/diseases13020045.


Understanding Citizens' Response to Social Activities on Twitter in US Metropolises During the COVID-19 Recovery Phase Using a Fine-Tuned Large Language Model: Application of AI.

Saito R, Tsugawa S J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e63824.

PMID: 39932775 PMC: 11862765. DOI: 10.2196/63824.


When Infodemic Meets Epidemic: Systematic Literature Review.

Asaad C, Khaouja I, Ghogho M, Baina K JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2025; 11:e55642.

PMID: 39899850 PMC: 11874463. DOI: 10.2196/55642.


The emotions of Chinese netizens toward the opening-up policies for COVID-19: panic, trust, and acceptance.

Dang Q, Li Y, Chen S Front Public Health. 2025; 12:1489006.

PMID: 39866354 PMC: 11758186. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1489006.


Analyzing Antecedent Configurations of Group Emotion Generation in Public Emergencies: A Multi-Factor Coupling Approach.

Yan X, Liu Y, Chen Y, Liu T Behav Sci (Basel). 2025; 15(1.

PMID: 39851845 PMC: 11762103. DOI: 10.3390/bs15010041.


References
1.
Youyou W, Stillwell D, Schwartz H, Kosinski M . Birds of a Feather Do Flock Together. Psychol Sci. 2017; 28(3):276-284. DOI: 10.1177/0956797616678187. View

2.
Tam C, Pang E, Lam L, Chiu H . Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Hong Kong in 2003: stress and psychological impact among frontline healthcare workers. Psychol Med. 2005; 34(7):1197-204. DOI: 10.1017/s0033291704002247. View

3.
Maunder R, Hunter J, Vincent L, Bennett J, Peladeau N, Leszcz M . The immediate psychological and occupational impact of the 2003 SARS outbreak in a teaching hospital. CMAJ. 2003; 168(10):1245-51. PMC: 154178. View

4.
Ackerman J, Becker D, Mortensen C, Sasaki T, Neuberg S, Kenrick D . A pox on the mind: Disjunction of attention and memory in the processing of physical disfigurement. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2009; 45(3):478-485. PMC: 2699287. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.008. View

5.
Diener E, Emmons R, Larsen R, Griffin S . The Satisfaction With Life Scale. J Pers Assess. 1985; 49(1):71-5. DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13. View